Agnostic.com

13 3

Just investigated Spinoza's god. Who knew that god was everything? What an astounding concept. Is that how you view the unknown or unknowable putative god? And come on atheists you must be tempted by the idea that what agnostics are wondering about is simply what is. Or are you?

waitingforgodo 8 Feb 10
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

13 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Yes. That is exactly how I view God. And whether they realize it or not... that is the God that believers all around the world have dressed up in local superstitions.
( IMHO )

skado Level 9 Feb 11, 2021

@skado Shazam, although that's exactly how I view everything without god im<ho. And while we're on the subject of fanciful belief I'd counsel that it's unlucky to be superstitious. Thank you for your earnest and percipient explication of the divine.

2

"Who knew that god was everything?"

Pantheists perhaps? Although one might take exception to the word "knew."

Quite so, and the provocateur's blessed tongue might need to be circumspect in the 1600's whereas a slip of the tongue today might be a welcome surprise.

0

What agnostics are wondering about doesn't bother me much. What does bother me is others who write to tell me what I think or what I must think.

1

"unknown or unknowable" and putative? hmm

4

Spinoza rejected the christian notion of a “personal” god, and worked his way towards a sort of philosophical pantheism. At this level, gods are returned to their primary function as metaphors. I don’t have to “believe” in metaphors, but can feel empowered to use them when I choose.

3

Spinozists have no dogma or central authority, you are sort of expected to figure it out. Christians would rightfully consider me an atheist because their version of god is not compatible with my belief. Calling it Tao or Om rather than god would probably be more familiar. To me "god" is a frame of reference that takes the universe as a whole rather than a sum of it's parts. Just as I have a personal identity, there is my body, my mind etc that encompasses the whole but is also is the singular identity, god is the context of the whole. There is nothing to prove or disprove.

What objective evidence do you have that any god exist?

@xenoview God doesn't exist per se because it's a frame of reference. The ocean doesn't cease to exist because it's 10 to the n molecules. The universe as a whole is god by definition but that doesn't invalidate any other frame of reference.

@Buttercup
All you have is subjective evidence coming from your mind that god is real. Give me something that is testable by anyone that a god is real.

@xenoview Don't get caught up in the Christian/ archaic definition of god, what Spinoza called god is a frame of reference and not some "guy". You can't hold a "mathematics" in your hand so in that sense it has no objective reality, but it's not only subjective either as as it can describe objective phenomena.

@xenoview
God, in the Spinozan sense, is, by definition, that which does exist.

@Buttercup You can't have it both ways. It sounds subjective to me. What objective evidence do you have for your god?

@Buttercup, @skado The spinozan god is subjective. Give me something objective that can be tested.

@xenoview God is subjective, I've said so already, you are arguing with yourself

@xenoview
Some humans dream in their sleep. Test that.

@skado You can test that. You can test the brainwaves and eye movement.

@Buttercup So your god is made up by your mind.

@xenoview Boy you're hostile, of course everything in my mind is made up in my mind. Beauty, philosophy, mathematics(the example I used already) or since these are not objects are you also going to insist that they aren't to be believed. You should read some Spinoza and quit insisting I must conform to "your" definition of god which "you" putatively insist is wrong.

@Buttercup You have failed to prove your god is real.

@xenoview
You can test for brain waves and eye movement but you can’t test for imagery and meaning content. My point being that gods are of this realm. They exist if dreams exist. You can test for churches, right?

@skado He is going to continue going "neener, neener, no it isn't" endlessly, without offering any thoughts of his own until we give up.

1
1

As an agnostic I have no knowledge any gods exist. As an atheist I believe in zero gods.

4

Here we are, trying to figure out God, Existence, Reality in a philosophical way while physicists are trying the same by way of scientific calculations as they inch their way through the universe as far as they are able. One thing is certain, for us there is no certainty. Even the scientists are constantly altering their conclusions. I love living in "I don't know." When you are open a lot of fascinating things fall in.

3

I consider myself an atheist mainly because I do not believe in any deity. The rest of it is just woo and I don't need it. 😁

0

So it had me curious and I searched and found website [plato.stanford.edu]

After looking thru just a little of the information I thought I had better write the editors at Stanford.

Greetings,

Copied below is parts from your website. Your website is saying that modern Judeo-Christian conception is not biblical BUT Spinoza's God is a paraphrase, rephrase or plagerzing of biblical text.

So to say, Spinoza's God is more inline with biblical text than modern Judeo-Christian conception.

I was reading through your website [plato.stanford.edu]

From your section 2.1 God or Nature:

According to the traditional Judeo-Christian conception of divinity, God is a transcendent creator, a being who causes a world distinct from himself to come into being by creating it out of nothing.

By contrast, Spinoza’s God is the cause of all things because all things follow causally and necessarily from the divine nature.

Biblically, it is written,

Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. Genesis 1:2

one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all. Ephesians 4:6

"For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together." Colossians 1:16-17

From Genesis it clearly indicates "ruach" elohim hovering over the "waters" .

What ever "waters" is, not for sure, but it is not indicating created from nothing.

Word Level 8 Feb 10, 2021
3

Why the desperate need to attach the label of god to a simple concept, thereby clouding the issue with a word imbued with so many different and confusing interpretations. Strikes me as a leap a faith based on some sort of speculative masturbation.

1

I have not investigated Spinoza's god. But, I read something that Einstein believed in Spinoza's god.

Word Level 8 Feb 10, 2021
Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:575404
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.