Yes, it seemed to me to be some people were purposely requesting the posts to be served up in the general feed rather than directing them to be posted only to the groups focused on that type of content.

I wonder how scantily clad female atheists differ from non-atheist scantily clad females except in their respective natural endowments, which, logically has nothing to with their religious status...LOL

Other's preferences needn't align with yours.

@Rossy92 Right, that's why I keep trying to configure my settings so that offensive posts don't take up so much of the posts served up to me. I enjoy the site otherwise.

@Julie808 I'll also note that humanism generally takes an open and liberal view toward sexuality and so-called "victimless crimes". But I respect that others preferences differ from mine, and wish you luck in getting your settings adjusted to your liking.

@Rossy92 Big difference between healthy sexuality and exploitation, both of which are open to interpretation and may have fine lines to some, but very clear lines to those recovering from sexual trauma, trafficking, sextortion, etc.

Humanisim to me means respect rather than exploitation. Your experiences are likely very different than mine, hence my discomfort in seeing photos meant to degrade a person sexually into an object rather than an equal partner. Touchy subject for some of us, and obviously not for some. Your idea of a "victimless crime" may be very different to a person who has been victimized to achieve the look of said "victimless" crime.

@Julie808 Indeed it is very open to interpretation, and I see this as no more an exploitation than the time and sweat one might put into working for an employer. And if one has no employer (for but one example, let's say in more primitive times), there is still time effort that you will expend for survival. It's simply the way it is. Not to discount legitimate claims of abuse and coercion of minors, or even unfair employment practices, I believe much of the claims of "exploitation" are simply holdovers of a puritanical Abrahamic religious ethic which puts a negative value judgment on any sort of sexuality outside of its narrow confines. Witness the guilt and shame which can be placed on the natural act of masturbation, certain early sexual encounters which though they should not be condoned, the primary psychological harm comes from the way the parenting adults heap on the unnecessary damage with their unnatural value judgments. Then there are the extreme examples of cultures which actually go so far as to dishonor a woman who is actually raped. But I would put the quotation marks around the "crime" in victimless crime. As I'm aware that others feel very differently, I try to remain open to their view of exploitation. But so far I've encountered no compelling argument.

Agree with all you stated .Some groups ( I say SOME) started and added to the original site 4 years ago ruined agnostic.com .