I don't mind. If mafia can control politicians, we can tolerate infilterated unions. Let everyone take advantage.

Most Terrorist groups are just Poor Man's Armies. And not all have socially progressive aims. Do you think Isis or Al Quaida give a hoot about workers, or unions?

Terrorist groups supporting labor unions?

Neither group benefits from the other. That would be like neo-nazis supporting school lunches for black children. It makes no sense.

Or did you get this idea from Fucker Carlson?

Ohferpetessake

Do you know what “begging the question” means?

As to needing weapons, your post is begging the question.

OK, the way that is phrased sounds corporate-biased. How would working to increase 'unionization', rather than the union undermining that the Right & GOP have pushed for decades (& seems much more 'nefarious' to me) be an act of "terrorism"?
Tho, admittedly, some Unions have been undermined (money, greed, co-opting by the corporation, "Mob" takeovers), the concept of guilds/unions are solid & one of the few real protections & solid voice for the worker. If weapons are needed to form Unions, we have far more problems than these "groups" you speculate about.

Can you name an example?

Who knows?

Sounds like a communist plot. Oh, wait this is the 21st-century… Forgot where I was there for a minute!