I like Dave Allen's take on the matter..

“agnostic” might also be defined as “against knowledge,” more in line with the original/site definition, fwiw; “not gnostic,” iow

also, you might just be slowly coming to the understanding of how to pronounce AEOU or something…since YHWH arent our vowels, but hebrew, transliterated. Also their holy-of-holies was an empty room? Point being that there is a guide for right where you are at, that we allow “believers” to interpret for us. Best wishes on your walk

Agnostics are fencesitters who like to keep the option open to argue with both sides.

jesus christ man! i really like ur words!

Let me see if I understand you. You say there is a word for which you can find no reliable definition...

and...

you are certain the thing the word refers to doesn’t exist...

because...

you don’t know what the word refers to.

Do I have that right?

Join the non-superstitious club. Except that I liked to read bedtime stories about Peter Pan and Tinker Bell (and insisted on keeping up the tooth fairy tradition) for my strongly atheist children.

I am not agnostic about the Biblical God, whatever that character is supposed to be it’s contradictory and frequently broke it’s own God rules at least according to the Bible. So no way it exist as defined.
Perhaps if there’s an inter dimensional pan galactic hyper intellectual being with sci-fi level abilities that we discover sometime in the future we might consider God like.
I have no evidence for or against such a being so I leave a slim chance something like that might exist, for all we know there could be an entire civilization of such beings, perhaps in the Virgo Super cluster of galaxies.
But the Gods of human religions are collectively a fucking joke, especially the one the Abrahamic religions enslaved humanity with.

@AtheistFirLife I agree with you. Don't listen to any of these abusive agnostics. You don't have to prove anything. Let the theists prove existence of a supreme being. They can't. In absence of their "proof", you have a right to assert that there is no fucking god. All these people claiming you have no evidence and their bullshit of endless diatribes. They all can go fuck themselves.

Your definition of god may not exist. Invisible pasta in the sky with meatballs may really not be there.

Geez, this is pretty strong stuff.

What evidence do you have for there being no gods?

Thank you for explaining your position clearly, that is the important thing. You will find that here on this site, few of the more long term members care much anyway, what people choose to label themselves, atheist, agnostic atheist, humanist, agnostic, sceptic, non-believer etc. etc. even if you miss use the labels, (a few pedants but not many), in part because the exact meaning of the labels has been debated so many times it is now regarded as boring. The main thing is that you have rejected religion and especially its dogma, and that is OK with most of us..

You will find that here abouts the labeling argument comes around as regular as Sundays.
Likewise the "Atheist but spiritual" bullshit