Agnostic.com

3 2

How Not To Cope With Vladimir Putin By Drilling and Pumping

Stan Cox, Cap the Wells Before It's Too Late

In case you hadn’t noticed, we live on an eternally well-oiled and well-gased planet. Only recently, for instance, Joe Biden announced that the U.S. was going to ramp up the supplies of frozen liquid natural gas (LNG) it sends to Europe by 15 billion cubic meters in response to the invasion of Ukraine and the sanctions on Russia that followed. That’s a lot of gas and, as a result, it looks like new LNG terminals will be opened in the Gulf of Mexico in the coming years. Hooray! The U.S., it seems, will be a fossil-fuel exporter until the end of time. The only sad news: the end of time may come sooner than we think.

In 2022, our choices on this planet seem increasingly clear and grim: blow it up, burn it up (or both). Yes, there have been increasing worries that, pushed against the wall by his failing invasion of Ukraine, Vladimir Putin might turn to his nuclear arsenal in some fashion. Only recently, both Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chairman of Russia’s security council, and its defense minister spoke openly about that possibility. Medvedev specifically insisted that, under certain circumstances, his country, which has the largest nuclear stockpile on the planet, might indeed consider the first use of such weaponry. As he put it, that would be in response to “an act of aggression… committed against Russia and its allies, which jeopardized the existence of the country itself, even without the use of nuclear weapons, that is, with the use of conventional weapons.” In other words, nuclear weapons are again in play on planet Earth, but when it comes to ultimate destruction, what isn’t?

Sadly enough, Putin and crew are in good company when it comes to preparing for planetary annihilation. After all, this country is now engaged in a three-decade-long “modernization” of its own nuclear arsenal at the cost of at least $1.7 trillion. And more generally, the Biden administration is responding to the new Cold War by preparing to ramp up the “defense budget” to a monumental $813.3 billion in 2023 — and that, keep in mind, is before Congress even gets the chance, as they did last year, to hike it further. In fact, a group of 40 House and Senate Republicans is already lobbying for more!

Full Article: [tomdispatch.com]

nogod4me 8 Apr 1
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

We have the capability. We should begin a Manhattan Project to begin financing, siting and building fusion reactors, the final form to be determined in two years. Fusion is within reach and should be accelerated.

@Garban The recent breakthroughs in high temperature superconducting tape may indicate much closer milestones for fusion.

I don't like Thorium fusion because it continues to produce highly dangerous long-term radioactive waste. The quantity is much reduced compared to uranium cycle reactors, but it is still being produced and represents an unworthy risk to future generations.

Even so, I would approve the construction of a pilot plant, to test out the technology. Note how they said it had to have a concrete cap to protect against an airplane crash. Radioactivity is hard to control. The metallurgy to manage the molten salt must be perfect or near-to.

1

And with the help of oil companies all too quick to price-gouge.

2

Com'on..is it really surprising that Rethugs and Mod Dems(Manchin) are pushing for More oil?..they're owned by the Corporations..and Manchin is the Largest stockholder in his sons Coal business..

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:658668
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.