Before he figured out that the Russian invasion of Ukraine is deeply unpopular in America, Trump said that Putin's actions
were "genius." Of course, now that he has figured out which way the wind is blowing, Trump has changed his tune. No surprise. Trump is a cynical liar.

@Flyingsaucesir Trump was using sarcasm. Trump is not a professional politician, so he makes it possible for the radical left to use his sarcastic statements against him.

@BD66 The thing is, this was not the first time Trump licked Putin's asshole. He did it constantly during his time in office. He even went so far as to say, on a world stage, that he believed Putin over our own American intelligence community. Taken in this context, it's obvious that my analysis, i.e. that Trump is a Putin loyalist and a cynical liar, is correct.

@Flyingsaucesir Because our own American Intelligence community was issuing false reports in an attempt to discredit Trump!

@BD66 Bullshit

@Flyingsaucesir

[bbc.com]

[justice.gov]

[apnews.com]

[usatoday.com]

[npr.org]

@BD66 See the video I posted an hour ago, where Trump crab-walks, quibbles, and equivocates rather than simply say that Putin is commiting war crimes in Ukraine. In the face of overwhelming evidence that Putin in a war criminal, Trump cannot bring himself to say the words.

@BD66 You are backing a loser.

@Flyingsaucesir Here's a timeline:

Political operatives associated with the Democratic Party came up with completely false information about Russian collusion in the 2016 election.

The FBI, due to some combination of bias and incompetence took those claims seriously and did a lengthy investigation.

They finally concluded those claims were completely false and rightfully charged those who fed them with false claims with crimes.

You are still clinging to the false information fed to the FBI by criminals.

Time to wake up dude!

@BD66 Read the Mueller Report. It states very clearly that there were many dodgy contacts between Russians and the Trump Campaign. While the FBI could not prove collusion, neither could they fully exonerate.

The report also laid out 10 instances of obstruction of justice, and Trump would have been indicted if it were not for a Justice Department opinion that a sitting President cannot be indicted.

Dude, you should know by now that I have a pretty good memory.

@Flyingsaucesir You retain the propaganda, and you ignore information the refutes the propaganda, much in the same way Christians can recite Bible stories that have been proven false by science.