Agnostic.com

5 1

"Not only was a heavily armed "seminude" murderer on the loose in Middle Tennessee, he was the same guy who tried to breach the White House perimeter last summer, identifying himself as a "sovereign citizen" who needed to have a word with President Trump. The story only got weirder: the 29-year-old Travis Reinking was also, it seems, convinced that Taylor Swift was stalking him. And while Reinking's copious firearms had been taken away after his White House incident, his father had legally reclaimed them, and returned them to his son, who on Sunday morning brought them to a Waffle House."
[rollingstone.com]

Angelface 7 Apr 25
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

He sure aired things out. The father should stand trial with him.

3

I think the father should be indicted, convicted, and go to jail. He is a co-conspirator in murder.

2

Sounds like he had the wrong psychiatrist 😟 a sad story all round.

Not so much sad but an indictment on beliefs held by many about the right to have any gun and how it is somehow connected to your manhood or machoism.

@Angelface I think if he had of had the right help it may have been prevented, going on the Taylor Swift stories he needed medication for a brain imbalance not counselling regarding his misplaced manhood! The fact that his Dad was an enabler...likely part of the issue.

@girlwithsmiles both he AND his father thought he shouldn't have had his guns taken away. My words, not the psychiatrist, concerning his guns. I believe it is a common misconception around certain men having a "John Wayne" mentality. With his background, Taylor Swift, the White House incident and others; WHY did he have guns in the first place and WHY wasn't more moderating done?

@Angelface yes, I get that...and his father brought him up I think? Therefore he's likely part of the issue. (i.e. where he got his belief system that he should have a gun regardless of his previous security breaching actions.) Anyway, it seems that we are somehow talking at cross purposes: so will leave it there.

Yes, we are talking at cross-purposes because we are each trying to get our own points across to a seemingly unreceptive audience.

Your point is that if he had better psychiatric care/ help to also counter his father's influence, this might not have happened. Or at least that was what I heard.

My point was why did he have the guns in the first place, why was his father not told to keep them away and in the second place why wasn't there more monitoring done on this individual?

Some men tend to equate their guns with their "manhood."

@Angelface this article talk about men are the main issue and no one is talking about it: [theguardian.com]

@girlwithsmiles I have to agree with his toxic childhood and his hated sense of inadequacy. Not only did his father bolster his belief in guns but his mother once posted online ironically that we wouldn't have mass shootings if prayer" hadn't been taken out of schools." I posted this about the killer. [nytimes.com]

2

Father never should have given guns back. He is guilty of assisted murder.

Charges are pending, but the father felt his son had the right to have guns. That is even crazier.

1

The worst part of that story is that his father, who surely should have known his son was unstable, gave the guns back to him.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:66321
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.