Agnostic.com

3 13

On the one hand, there's a belief system based upon nothing more than faith but on the other hand is a strict system of requiring proof before accepting anything as fact and even after having proven beyond a reasonable doubt that something is indeed factual, the door is left open to revisions based upon new data becoming available that may overturn the perceived fact, in whole or in part.
You can live your life based upon a belief system that is nothing short of fantastical and magical or you can Cowboy-Up and live your life based upon hard facts. Your choice, one road is hard and the other road is easy, the easy road is the one that will most likely bite you in the ass in the end.

SnowyOwl 8 June 15
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

2

It is so much worse than that. The difference is between 6,000 years and 4,300,000,000. If we suppose it took 6,000 years to lay down 20 feet of sedimentary rock, the column should be 1.4 million feet tall (2700 miles). The scientifically determined age of the earth is 71,600 TIMES the Biblical age. That's a big and obvious difference.

Not only did the majority of Americans not buy the A&W 1/3 Pounder over the McDonald's 1/4 Pounder because they thought the Quarter Pounder was bigger but most of them can't tell the difference between 1M, 1B and 1T, except that 1B is probably a little bigger than 1M and 1B vs 1T is about the same. We're doomed I tell you - DOOMED!!

1

Nice summary of the choices. Love the sea stack! 😎👍

1

LMAO!

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:671892
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.