Agnostic.com

1 0

With Roe v. Wade in doubt, some liberals fault Ruth Bader Ginsburg for not retiring early.
Some fans are now souring on her legacy...
[reason.com]

SpikeTalon 9 June 17
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

I fault Ruth Bader. She was terminal ill, she was sick for some time, she was frail, she was fully aware of the threat to Roe vs Wade but still did not retire soon enough during the presidency of a Democrat President. What do you call it? Power and status hungry. She is made a hero beyond reason just like we have done to the power hungry, frail, useless and Democrat's Achilles heel Nancy Pelosi in every election. Republicans take out campaign buses on the road cross-country with Pelosi's face on it.

You nailed it, power hungry, and look at what that's got us...

@SpikeTalon

Less dead kids???

Why don’t you people cheer school shootings???

Ginsburg, Pelosi, Biden... Frail and useless is being quite kind indeed. 🙄

@CourtJester Yeah right, as if banning things ever made them go away. Look at all the gun control laws on the books that have continually failed us, which is why I'm against any sort of gun control legislation because such does absolutely nothing. Same is true with anti abortion laws, women will still find ways to abort regardless of what your laws have to say.

The point for this post in case you missed it, was to point out double standards from the left regarding being upset now over Roe being in jeopardy, when in reality they could thank one of their own for being selfish and ultimately putting Roe on the chopping block. The irony there amuses me.

@Captain_Feelgood Democrats are upset at the conservative-leaning SCOTUS Judges when in reality they have one of their own (Ginsburg) to thank for their current woes on the matter. The irony there is split thick.

@SpikeTalon

So now there is no need to make things illegal?

@CourtJester Recreational drugs are illegal, has that stopped people from acquiring drugs and in the process develop drug addictions? Prostitution is illegal, has that stopped all sex workers? Look at all the useless gun control laws, which have done nothing to deter violent gunmen. Women will still find ways around anti abortion laws. There are laws against murdering fellow human beings, yet people murder others every day, so what good are all these laws anyway if so many simply choose to ignore them? Also, in order to enforce such laws like anti abortion ones, conceivably that means it could come at the expense of the taxpayers, as if the taxpayers already don't get screwed over enough as is with all the socialized Government programs.

Go ahead and make things illegal/ban them if you so desire, just don't be surprised if your laws fail and people doing whatever they want to regardless, is all I'm saying. Criminals and desperate people care not about the laws.

@CourtJester Do you cheer drug overdoses? Recreational drugs for the most part have been against the law sense the early 1900s. 🙄

@Captain_Feelgood
I actually do. I’m a Dr. and have to keep them living periodically. I’ve found that those that live are 99% entitled democrats. I’ll always do my job, but I’ve never lost a second’s sleep over one that did it to themselves and I couldn’t help. I personally count it as a win and have been known to say “One more down” with a grin and a finger snap if the company is right.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:672235
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.