Agnostic.com

15 1

Which Religious Apologist do you dislike the most (William Lane Craig, Ray Comfort, Eric or Kent Hovind, David Wood, etc.) ?

ImRonBurgundy 5 Apr 27
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

15 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Kent Hovind currently makes my blood pressure rise. He's such an asshole!! They all are, but he's currently my worst, lol.

0

Bill Donohue is one of the most annoyingly stupid things. Non-stop ad hominem attacks.

Example of profound evil:

0

All the pre sups, they are annoying and egotistical

0

I will have to look up many listed below as I'm not familiar with many of them except Ham, Comfort, Craig. But two that I particularly dislike are Dennis Prager, because he is so pompously arrogant, and Frank Turek, because he's is so aggressive with his bullshit. He has said that if God commanded him to kill his child that he would. For those unfamiliar with him, here is a brief glimpse of his aggressive style in the opening of this video with Hitchens.

Yeah, both of them are without any morality, but their own. Excellent examples of all that Hitchens, et al, have described as some of the worst of the worst.

0

Matt Slick and Sye Ten Bruggancate.

0

Ray Comfort and Kent Hovind are tied for first place with most of the rest of them just a hair's breadth behind. It's hard to make a choice among the apologists.

1

Sye Ten Bruggencate hands down. Oh what a pompous asshat.

Proto Level 6 Apr 28, 2018
0

Ken Hamm and Sye Ten Bitch

1

They're all human garbage, but I think Ham's anti-science crusade makes him the most offensive of an offensive lot.

1

a lot of people say Ham but I gotta go with David Miscavige, Tom Cruise or whoever his current lieutennant is. The scientologists are freaking wack.

4

I'm not sure if he falls under the apologist umbrella exactly, but I abhor Ken Ham.

He thinks I'm on par with the devil since I'm a science instructor. His "work" is at odds with everything I teach, critical thinking and free thought. He actually tells child that people like me are trying to trick them. Makes me angry.

Hard to top Ham.

4

The religious figures on my really dislike list are those who are mixing politics and religion and trying to cram it down our throats. All of the others, to me, are simply irrelevant.

0

My vote is for William Lane Craig. It mostly because of the talks/website of expastor John Loftus who took his classes as a grad student and now has a blog/website and has also writen and been the editor of books that expand on the problems with xianity. Also, Craig will now not debate Loftus because Loftus doesn't have a "doctorate" of theology.

Craig is the most insidious of the lot because he's the most sophisticated and he doesn't make incredibly dumb arguments like Ham, Hovind and Ray Comfort do. Those are just incredibly easy to knock aside.

4

I don't know much about any of them, but Kent Hovind is pretty easy to dislike. Ray Comfort is obnoxious, but so stupid that he's actually kind of amusing. I also find it really easy to despise Kirk Cameron.

JimG Level 8 Apr 27, 2018
0

Gracious! Why would I want to read a religious apologist's books? It's all nonsense, so why bother.

@ImRonBurgundy I have no wish to argue with religious people..I just avoid them.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:68080
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.