“God is that force within you that calls you to the adventure of your life.”
My life is a great adventure, but I always had my own strength and willpower as force, not any of the non-existing gods.
Yes, of course. Peterson, if I understand correctly, is just saying that those forces that you mention are what have historically been called "God".
The hero's journey is not a calling. We are born with it. It is embedded in our psyche and manifests in our desire to leave the tribe, to be individuals, to find our own way, to not do what we are told to do.
Then that god is dead.
So sorry.
This is agency inference (made worse with theological terminology). Adventure doesn't call to us and there is no invisible being calling us to it. It can feel like a calling, but it is really just our emotional response to what we consider to be compelling about our life experiences.
I resist re-labeling things we have perfectly serviceable words for -- existence, life, joy, the universe, nature -- as "god". Half the time people who do this are using it as a Trojan horse to get buy-in on a generic god-concept and then pivot to their specific god. Other times it is unbelievers trying to explain the concept of "the divine" as something inherent in or emergent from the natural world, but theists will invariably seize upon such notions and reinterpret them to suit their own beliefs.
I would have put this idea forth in this way: "Meaning and purpose are found in life's adventures". It's not as sexy but it's far more accurate.
I would argue that most of the relabeling has occurred only in the last couple hundred years. God is the word that is grandfathered in. There is a hazard, as you point out, in using poetic language, but one of the benefits is that it makes the material accessible to more people (metaphor operates in an older evolutionary layer of the brain. Reason is the newcomer). And there is no such thing as preventing humans from getting things wrong. No choice of words will prevent that.
It's just art. A world of nothing but precise prose would be uninhabitable for humans. It's not that one language is better than the other; we need both. I don't really think we can have one in the world without the other. I won't allow the erroneous perceptions of literalists to determine what I do. I will defend art in my world. (and reason too!)
@skado Yes this is just me caring about being precise. I'm under no illusion that any choice of words is foolproof or free from fooling or impervious to fools, etc. However words, and how we frame discussions, matter. And if there's a better way to describe things, I try to find it.
As you suggest, symbolism and metaphor matter too. The unconscious deals in symbols and you can reach it with them. One of those symbols is "the divine" as a principle or ethos apart from any presuppositionalist notions of agency. Here again ... the label is, for many, evocative of way more than it was arguably intended to evoke.
I'm pretty much resigned to god-talk hanging around for a very long time no matter what I think about it ...
Bah Humbug! It is my inner child struggling to be free!
Let that kid out!
@skado my mission in life...i call it "sparkling"!
That’s pretty cheesy. Why use the word “God”? Is that the same fictional force that impregnated Mary, divided the Red Sea, gives virgins to believers, allegedly answers prayers? But what is it that calls you to your life’s adventure? That’s a good question. I agree it is found by looking within, by listening and observing, opening and letting go. And “adventure” is an interesting choice in words. In my practice it is about opening to the vitality of the moment. The “adventure of your life” is about being present with compassion, curiousity, creativity... moment to moment and grooving on the ride.
Very well said
"...being present with compassion, curiousity, creativity..."
is about as good as it gets I think. Thanks for putting those words together so beautifully.