@Ryo1 Love this man he is such an intelligent and eloquent speaker and the best representative of an atheist one could possibly ask for and has the guts to speak his mind

If you think the point of the original post is about Dawkins defending religion, you're missing the whole point, mate.

@bebe12

Yes he does does he?:

[twitter.com]
Someone not Dawkins: “I honestly don't know what I would do if I were pregnant with a kid with Down Syndrome. Real ethical dilemma.”

RD: “Abort it and try again. It would be immoral to bring it into the world if you have the choice.”

[cnn.com]

Egads not going to quote:
[twitter.com]

followed by:
[twitter.com]

[twitter.com]
“Of course you can have an opinion about Islam without having read Qur'an. You don't have to read Mein Kampf to have an opinion about nazism.”

[twitter.com]
“Living in a university it's easy to forget the mean IQ of the population at large is 100, & 50% of them are in the bottom half.”

[twitter.com]
“Oh NO. Just checked my privilege. Turns out I'm a white heterosexual male. [campusreform.org] How can I atone? Hair shirt? Flagellation?”

[twitter.com]
“Bin Laden has won, in airports of the world every day. I had a little jar of honey, now thrown away by rule-bound dundridges. STUPID waste.”

[twitter.com]
“It’s one thing to deplore eugenics on ideological, political, moral grounds. It’s quite another to conclude that it wouldn’t work in practice. Of course it would. It works for cows, horses, pigs, dogs & roses. Why on earth wouldn’t it work for humans? Facts ignore ideology.”

And for real fun look up the infamous “Dear Muslima”…

@Ryo1

Religion was used as a tool also. for Germany was a strong Christian nation in 1st ans 2nd world war as Hitler was born and died as a catholic. Although I agree with Dawkins that nationalism is more dangerous than religion. I think centroism does more harm than good.