Agnostic.com

2 1

[notrickszone.com]
More than 500 prominent scientists from all over the world, among them distinguished MIT climate scientist Prof. Richard Lindzen, are urging the Secretary-General of the United Nations for a further, de-politicised discussion of the climate issue, in which alternative scientific views are also given a voice.

A UN climate meeting will be held in New York on 23 September. To this end, CLINTEL has sent two registered letters, one to the UN Secretary-General, António Guterres, and one to the Executive Secretary of the UNFCCC, Patricia Espinosa Cantellano, together with the text of the European Climate Declaration (see below).

This also includes the explicit request to organise a joint meeting with world-class scientists. The letter follows:
[notrickszone.com]

1patriot 8 Feb 24
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Your source is just an opinion blog, primarily known for denying climate change.

[mediabiasfactcheck.com]

bullshit it is climate news blog to counter the alarmist that think they will die 3-5 years because of CO2 LOL

2

Skeptical Science has a great APP to answer the climate change deniers. You can type in the climate change deniers nonsense and get the scientific rebuttal or answer, see below.

Explaining climate change science & rebutting global warming misinformation

Global warming is real and human-caused. It is leading to large-scale climate change. Under the guise of climate "skepticism", the public is bombarded with misinformation that casts doubt on the reality of human-caused global warming. This website gets skeptical about global warming "skepticism".

Our mission is simple: debunk climate misinformation by presenting peer-reviewed science and explaining the techniques of science denial, discourses of climate delay, and climate solutions denial.

[skepticalscience.com]

Get the Skeptical Science App:

iPhone: [skepticalscience.com]?

Android: [skepticalscience.com]?

  • the planet has warmed since 1998
  • yea skeptical science is say the are predicting warming using their climate models which are flawed
  • and no i would never load pseudoscience on my phone that's for suckers like you

@1patriot You couldn't understand it anyway.

@1patriot Climate change was identified by the 1960's, and confirmed in the 1970's. That and the OPEC oil embargo was why Jimmy Carter implemented an energy plan to get the U.S. off of fossil fuels back in the late 1970's. Of course when Reagan came in he totally tracked the plan and made us even more dependent on foreign oil.

1998, was more like when the U.S. government finally publicly acknowledged climate change as a real threat.

@snytiger6 and it hasn't been that warm 26 years later

@1patriot Your words are gobbledygook. If you want to make a point, you need to learn how to read and write.

Using the laugh emoji 😂 on people's serious or relevant comments as if it was a weapon or had power is laughable already. But when you paste words you don't understand and make unintelligible comments without proof and reference to facts, it is even funnier. When you make a post with ridiculous memes and debunked articles that you copy and paste you seem like a gullible, childish, fool.

Are you sure you are not Russian or a Trump rioter and insurrectionist hiding out in Canada? The word "riot" is contained in your handle. Even so, you are a riot.

By the way, are you a patriot of Canada or a US patriot wannabe ? You seem more interested in the US than Canada. Please don't come here, we have too many Trump loonies as it is.

@nogod4me Latvian no doubt, they have an entire organization ready to go, leftover from 2016.

@nogod4me He can read and write, but he either doesn't have the ability to comprehend what he reads, or he is an extreme example of "willful ignorance" at work, refusing to consider any other point of view that contradicts his preconceived notions, much like religious people do. He might find more people who agree with him on an evangelical site.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:747849
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.