The search results provide insights into discussions around climate alarmism and related peer-reviewed studies. Here are some relevant findings:
Roger Pielke Jr. discusses an extended peer review of a paper questioning the existence of a climate emergency and the motivations behind climate alarmism, suggesting that it aims to bring about significant economic changes through government spending
1
. James Hansen, a prominent scientist, has warned about the accelerating rate of global heating in a research paper that is yet to undergo peer review, emphasizing the urgency of addressing climate change
2
. An article highlights concerns that scientific alarmism influences the climate policies of the Department of Defense, suggesting that peer review processes may favor consensus over rigorous evaluation
3
. The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) discusses the dangerous outcomes of climate alarmism and references peer-reviewed literature indicating human-caused warming, reflecting differing perspectives on the issue
4
. An article on Forbes challenges global warming alarmists, accusing them of misrepresenting peer-reviewed literature to support their claims, highlighting ongoing debates surrounding climate science and alarmism
5
. While these sources touch on various aspects related to climate alarmism and peer-reviewed studies, it is essential to critically evaluate information from diverse perspectives to form a comprehensive understanding of the complex issue of climate change.

AI response on "are there peer reviewed studies on no climate emergency" so why is it that there are peer reviewed studies "on there is nothing to alarmed about". to where there are no peer reviewed studies we should be alarmed about our climate.....