Yes, I have long held that real working intelligence, of all types, which actually count for something in the world, has much more to do with values and traits of personality, than it does with mere problem solving skills. Indeed I would think obvious, that it is quite possible for a person of low I. Q. to get to high levels of understanding, if they apply time, hard work and set high standards for themselves.

Which is why science, especially, is more than just a working practice, but also a philosophy, a useful life guide and world view. Since in the end, science is basically the philosophy that hard work is the best route to truth, rather than revelation or the blind acceptance of unsupported authority. And when once conditioned by prolonged contact with science, especially its history and philosophy rather than just its working practice, it is hard for a person to just fall in to the acceptance of lazy and sloppy world views which do not measure up to its standards.

I used to work with a radar targeting system. No GPS, we had to site where we set up using a map, going to the closest meter if we could. It is important because if you enter the wrong coordinates then you are not exactly where you think you are, therefore any targeting will also be out. But maps are not always perfect with their contouring etc and if you recognised it looked out, you adjusted. You used your initiative.

What I am saying is the place where you start critical thinking must be accurate or you will reach the wrong conclusion, be a bit off target. This means you must recognise your own biases and/ or agenda. Pre-assumptions; are they correct? If assumptions not totally correct, then how could the outcome change?

Assume nothing and be skeptical of everything. Be pragmatic in conclusions not ideological driven and recognise your own biases will affect your assessment. Do this and you at least start from the right place.