Gee, not ONE one of my Xtian relatives or friends have liked this on FB. On the other hand, the pagans have liked it!

No offense to my Xtian friends and family, but if one studies mythology, it is clear to see that the Hebrews took their tales from preceding religions. So did Xtianity.
For instance, every creation myth I've read has the same elements: there is darkness and a void, abyss or simply nothingness. From the void/abyss/nothingness, the first god arises. In Egypt, there was a watery abyss. And Atum arises from it, applies order to chaos, and creates the universe. There are variants of the myth and Atum might be called by another name in some. This does not detract from the myth. In fact, in the Hebrew Scriptures, deity is referred to as Yahweh (singular and masculine) and Elohim (plural and feminine, aka "goddesses" ).

The ancient Egyptians also believed that nothing could exist without a name, and Atum called/named "things" into being. In the Hebrew myth, Yahweh/Elohim did the same, "And god said 'Let there be light' . . ."

Another myth is the dying resurrecting god. The Hebrews did not have this myth, but Xtianity does. Before there was Jesus, there were Osiris and Inanna, both who died and resurrected. Osiris' death and resurrection meant that humans could do the same--if their remains were preserved. Egyptian burial practices still exist per embalming bodies to be raised in the resurrection when Jesus returns. It is not clear why Inanna descended into Kur, the Sumerian underworld, but it seems to be for knowledge of death. She was Queen of Heaven and Earth, but death was the unknown. She was resurrected but could only stay out of Kur if she appointed someone to take her place; she chose her husband, Dumuzi, who had been living it up while she was below ground. There is a shift in the myth from Inanna to Jesus is that Inanna had to find someone to take her place while Jesus takes the place of humans condemned to hell.

The descent into hell is also a common theme: Osiris, Inanna/Ishtar, Persephone and the Aztec Divine Twins all made this trip. So did Jesus--when he was dead for three days, he "harrowed" hell, bringing up the patriarchs who had been sent there because they died before he was born. If you have not heard this, it is because you have been raised Protestant instead of Catholic. The tale was a staple in Xtian lore for centuries.
Mithras, a Persian/Roman god, was born of a virgin in at least one variant myth in which his mother was the goddess Anahita. In other myths, he was born from a cave. The father of Perseus, a demi-god, was apparently a stream of gold. While the gold was ostensibly Zeus, the conception was still "virginal."

And lest you be thinking that the Hebrew Scriptures do not have variant myths, there are two versions of creation and the flood. There are different accounts of aspects of Jesus. I have read apologists explain the differences for Jesus as being from different perspectives of the spectators . . . Hmm, one would think it a book which contains not errors, their experiences would be the same.

I have also read Xtian apologists claim that the similar myths were planted by Satan because he knew that Jesus would be born thousands of years beforehand, so he manipulated the myths. Of course, I have read apologists say that Satan also planted dinosaur bones to make the earth appear to be older than 6,000 years.

Unlike evangelical Xtians, I am not sharing this information to persuade anyone from their Xtian faith, but that there are reasons why people do not buy into the religion.
I could write a lot more--in fact, I even began writing a book about these issues years ago. Maybe I will finish it when I retire.