Agnostic.com

9 17

"Death is but a transition..." Maybe others who follow the FB group for Carl Sagan's Vision saw this too, but I thought I'd post it here as well, as it so succinctly echoes my own thoughts about life and death. I love it!

I asked the poster (Guy Nancarrow) who wrote it. He also runs the group, but he just "loved" my question, without answering, so I'm guessing that he wrote it, but it's shown with an image that appears to be Brian Cox, so I'm confused. I guess it's just humanity's words, available to me without attribution to use in some of my funerals.

Julie808 8 Sep 9
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

9 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

"Death is but a door. Time is but a window. I'll be back."
Vigo the Carpathian (Ghostbusters 2)

0

If that is so what is birth? Is it also a transition? Will death go back to where one one before one was born? When I see all the horrors I might have missed before I was born I'm glad I wasn't around then. I also can foresee future horrors and will be glad I'm no longer around, I hope.

Mormons believe that shit, that human souls always have existed and always will, and this life on earth is just a test to which heaven you are worth of going to, it's complete bullshit of course, but it seems to make them ... well not happy but smug gits

@LenHazell53 What it makes them is clueless (which many would prefer to being 'enlightened' to whats going in in the world). I've asked myself, if there were no limits on births than the universe could probably bear an infinite no. of humans. The problem is if we supposedly have no death will we outlive the present universe?

Sure, I guess birth is a transition, though a slow one that takes 9 months in most cases, from being just a glimmer in a parent's eye to emerging with a scream. There was nothing before conception other than maybe hopes and wishes and nothing after death except for ideas, memories and maybe a few tangible things left behind.

@Julie808 But not with those being born. Very few even remember any time within the first couple of years of their lives. SO it's really about glimmer in ones eye!? Oh, as for the screaming this did not happen with my daughters birth and she tells me it also did not happen when her half sister was born. The Okie doctor told her (just before cutting her) "gee ma'am, you'd make a good brood mare.

4

It seems to be a trend on Facebook to place the image of someone with a statement in a way that gives the impression that it's their quote and I agree, it's often confusing. I think it also gives the writer the latitude to modify it to suit their own intent. (FB punishes me for reposting them here and there.)

I've followed Professor Cox for a number of years and this doesn't really sound like anything I've heard from him - although polite, he's more pragmatic and I think would have taken the words "transition" and "transcending the boundaries of time and space" more literally instead of using them this way. But I could be wrong.

That said, the gist of the writing is warm and comforting, and conveys the best immortality most of us could (should?) hope for. So I think you have total latitude to make it your own and use it as you feel it would do the most good. Maybe you'll make it even better.

1

It's fair enough that those who are left behind fondly remember their loved ones after they passed away. Meanwhile, many people want to be remembered after they die, don't they? Why do you think that is? Do you want to be remembered after you're gone? I'm just wondering.

Ryo1 Level 8 Sep 9, 2024

I will remain unknown to billions more than the few who will remember me. I’m ok with that.

@yvilletom Same here.

If anyone remembers me after I die, I can only hope it will be fondly.

@Julie808

Food for research by sociologists: is being loved a female thing and being remembered a male thing? Do transfolk (transmen and transwomen) have preferences?

I’m studying sociology and looking for research topics.

@yvilletom Isn't it well-documented that there are differences in brain circuits betweeen men and women? Maybe you can safely assume that a trans woman still has the male brain circuit and vice versa.

@Ryo1

Can I safely assume that the transwoman’s male brain, before his transition to female, operated as a fully male brain?

Or that a transman’s female brain, before her transition to male, operated as a fully female brain?

I am male, and a gender non-conformist. I enjoy women’s humor about men more than I enjoy men’s humor about women.

I seriously doubt my late partner even cared. From early on she was taught to question everything (from her illiterate, Moslem mother). She was told she was like her maternal grandfather who stood out as a sort of questioner and trouble maker. From an early age she realized religion was silly and couldn't understand how people believed all this crap. At the same time she understood the life/death connection. She never wanted anyone to bring attention to her (she had to do this herself) and this included after her death which turned out to be an ideal death and she appreciated the gift she was given up to the very end. She gave her body to the will body program and being able to help with research was the only attention she wanted.

@yvilletom
You'll have to explore a lot to answer those questions. Good luck with your study.


Researchers have observed sex differences in the volume of certain brain regions in animals. Some studies suggest these anatomical differences are largely due to the effects of sex hormones on brain development. More recent research suggests that the activity, or “expression” of genes on the sex chromosomes plays a role in shaping these anatomical differences. Each cell in your body carries a pair of sex chromosomes, including your brain cells. Females have two X chromosomes, and males have one X and one Y.
[nih.gov].

2

I’ve seen Brian Cox’s name among those of Big Bang fans.

The Big Bang (gravity-only universe) lacks evidence; the Electric Universe (electricity+gravity) has evidence.

2

I think the meme is priceless in that it speaks a basic truth that should apply to all of us and everything else that exists. Using it and going with it should bring contentment to many of us. The problems I have is that whether the dead are buried or cremated it seems to me that they did not go back to the stars. At least not yet. How does the body get out of that fancy box and vault to do so? I'm not sure. As for a soul that went back to be with god, what are ministers meaning here? You are the soul. You are either a dead soul or an alive soul. If you are a god believer your god did not give you a soul. In fact, his breath (the breath of life) is how you became a living soul. One of my pet peeves is being at a graveside funeral and once it is all over someone claims the deceased is "up there in heaven now and smiling down on us." Are they blind or insane? Just a few minutes before they were being lowered into the ground.

Yes, I think it's a bit of a stretch of the imagination to think that somehow a person's spirit or soul is magically transported instantly into an unknown heaven or hell outside of our own view and touch. People like something easy to believe in to soften the grief.

I personally don't think we need such a convoluted story to help us through the grief, but maybe just the natural reality is best.

When people say "dust to dust" for example, they are not suggesting that this transition happens instantly, but over time. For the "cosmic dust" reference, perhaps that wouldn't happen until the next big bang, who knows.

I often assist people with the scattering of ashes, and those ashes end up becoming part of the landscape, seascape or perhaps get ingested by plants, birds, sea life, but not instantaneously, it takes time.

What means more to me than what happens to our bodies after we die, is that I like to think that what people stood for or were passionate about might be passed on to those who remember them, to carry out that legacy.

For example, when I have conversations with people about the separation of church and state, or the freedom of religion and natural, philosophical and scientific ways of thought instead of religious mythology, maybe some of my ideas will creep into the minds of others who might cultivate them by their actions or speaking up, while I'm still alive and perhaps after I'm gone.

I like to think of spreading ideas out to be like laying a foundation for others to build upon. For those who might think my ideas are "far out" well they can look to the stars at night, far out in the universe, and think of me, haha!

I think for some of us, the one thing we want to avoid is to have our death actually contribute to further problems with using valuable resources here on Earth.

2

For “the cosmic dust” I would write “the unknown”

Yes, that might be a good change. I think the "cosmic dust" reference can be a metaphor for the unknown, or whatever is yet to be created out of the atoms in our bodies, breath, etc., as a slightly less spiritual/religious location such as heaven.

It's meant to be somewhat poetic I think, but at least a little more airy and free than imagining our minds being forever locked in by the gates of heaven and being subjected to harp music and hymns all day, or being tossed into the furnace of hell.

3

I attended a traditional Church of Scotland funeral recently and as the minister sprinkled some earth on the coffin in the grave he said something like " The deceased comes from star dust where he returns". I thought, this guy is very modern in his outlook, but then he spoiled it by saying "but his soul has gone to be with the lord. Still it's a start I suppose.

Coming from and returning to star dust requires propulsion. Is there a knowledge boundary?

@yvilletom not if you drift on the Ether.....

@yvilletom All matter on earth is composed from the residue of exploding stars so that is correct and when the sun eventually obliterates the earth it will be back there , just takes a bit of time.

@Moravian

What is your evidence?

@yvilletom [education.nationalgeographic.org]

Common knowledge surely?

Yes, I think people like to hear traditional comforting words, along with some metaphorical way to think about the loved one, who was here interacting with us, but now is silent and lifeless.

I offer funeral services where I can assure the client there will be no mention of religious references or supernatural deities or a mythological afterlife.

People can generally think what they like about where they imagine the deceased is, if not in the box or the urn, but I'm not going to say anything that goes against what my deceased client wanted said.

Funeral celebrancy is changing to match the growing secular population.

@Moravian Much common knowledge is prolly common belief.

1

Life is but a transition from dust to dust?

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:766363
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.