Thanks for that. Added to my growing collection.

That is an idea I hadn't entertained but can see how it could prove effective

"You really should send this picture to your doctor. Those little bumps and that rash really need to get looked at - but NOT by me."

That is the simple truth but when it unwinds it gets a lot more tangled

@MermaidSuzy888 Would you feel less put out if it had been of a size worth seeing???

It's tempting but I won't say it. LOL

@MermaidSuzy888 LOL now I am tempted.

@MermaidSuzy888 I agree. Cyber can be fun, by mutual consent.
What gets me is this exchange:
Him: hi!
Me: hello!
Him: full length nude or dick pic.
Me: block, BLOCK!

Was my hello too suggestive?! Nah, actually I’m thinking, bullet dodged.

@MermaidSuzy888 Cyber sex? Isn't that like fucking your phone?

What was the woman's response that made you realize your mistake? Knowing it may help us ladies get through to other guys.

@Sara72712 Well I should add that I thought the conversation had moved in that direction enough to make it appropriate but she DID NOT ask for it. So, she told me that was completely inappropriate and the main thing that got me was when she said if I had walked up to her on the street and engaged her in conversation for 1/2 hour and then just exposed myself, that would be unlawful!!! That got me right there! In addition to the fact that it's disrespectful and leaves nothing for the imagination for later! Does that all make ssense?

@Sara72712 thanks for the question Sara and the genuine interest in an answer!

@districtnative thank you for your honesty!

@AMGT now if that could just work for me ( at least I don't have hair) I notice a lot of people assume I am a man in this personae

@MermaidSuzy888 no pun intended I am sure

@btroje whaaat?..

@Charlene what I said and it actually applies both ways

get a grip either you think what you got is good enough for anyone or you are looking for different things than the woman if you are courting and looking for something meaningful then it is irreverent if she loves or likes you she will like whatever you have but if its just a hook up the rules are different and men with not much to show often feel that way its not necessarily about self esteem its about what you want and sounds like you want more than a toss in the hay nothing wrong with that

how is it violence ive seen violence and a dic pic is nothing like that and if its requested or not if you want it ok if not delete it no biggie

Yeah, I pondered that word when I wrote it. In my view 'violence' can be other than just physical. If someone passed me in the street and out of the blue, leant into my face and bellowed the 'C' word, I'd put that in the category of violence. But I'm a sensitive bunny.

I will clarify though, that in no way am I putting it in the category of a physical attack or sexual assault. Though it is stronger than just sexual aggression and it's a breach of a person's right to dignity, and respect. But yep, 'violence' may be the wrong word for it.

@DaveMania inappropriate maybe unsolicited buck up buttercup you need to not be so delicate life is tough

@MermaidSuzy888 Yes - sure does

I have to object to your claims. These are not mentally or emotionally stunted men. These are grown adults. They work. They pay bills. They have children. But they still send these inappropriate pictures to strangers online. Don't let them off the hook so easily. As a man in your 70s, you need to hold these men to higher standards. 'Well, at least they aren't killing people.' Really, hold them to higher standards.

@Sara72712 Oh, I'd certainly like to see them held to adult standards. They, along with damaged females, are what our society manufactures and each generation gets sicker. What passes for 'sex education' cannot possibly contain detailed information about human sexuality. If it did and if heads weren't filled with untruths or complete ignoring of it, this juvenile nonsense wouldn't happen.

@Sara72712 There was a time, not long ago, when some words used today, and quite incorrectly, as common insults had serious, clinical meaning in categorizing levels of arrested mental development:

Idiot - developmental age 1-3. Imbecile 3-7 Moron 8-12.

Advancement of science and over-misuse of the terms as insults caused their original meanings to be lost. The reason I bring it up is that adults fitting into the 8-12 category are capable of literacy; of holding down jobs requiring simpler, mechanistic labor; of speaking in normal, correct language; of breeding; of voting; of expressing opinions based on simple, often inaccurate understanding of sophisticated ideas.

They are also capable of comprising a large share of thoughtless mobs; of behaving like nine year olds in circumstances that call for better and to which their chronological ages allow them access. Nothing particularly evil about them personally but they are very....not smart and severely underdeveloped. The term 'grown adult' is often applied to them because that is what they look like, until that is, ignorant, juvenile behavior discloses what they are functionally.

@Silver1wun LOL! You can't be serious?? This is the best fiction I've read in a long time. I hold a couple psychology degrees. But I still can't figure out why you are defending these people. Are you poorly trying to describe Goddard's theory? That was about IQ, by the way, not age.

Yes, there is a developmental spectrum, but the vast majority of people are doing just fine. These inappropriate men do not have the mental age (or maturity) of a 9 year old. They are just privileged assholes who think they get to be creeps to whomever they wish.

@Silver1wun also, damaged females? Please elaborate.

really that good huh awesome good job

I wanna see