One of my main gripes with organized religion is the hypocrisy of it all. It is quite convenient to cherry pick which words of god apply you and/ or others. Wouldn't someone that truly believes want to live it all without questioning, ignoring, or omitting unpleasantries?
It boggles the mind, doesn't it? I often think that there's no way people can really believe it. Even my daughter when she was seven years old and.explaining what they told her in church (Her mother and I were separated.), asked me, "Do grow-ups really believe this? Are they crazy?"
You have to consider that churches have been "indoctrinating" their followers for.millennia. They start young, use mysticism, rituals, and symbols to convince people. It's all very elaborate. Music and hymns are great brainwashing tools. They instill fear that questioning their doctrines will earn you the most horrific punishments imaginable for all of eternity. Finally they promise eternal life. People really want to believe and are afraid not to.
You mean like where it says in the Bible that it's OK if you beat your slave to death as long as he/she doesn't die on the day of the beating because that shows that you didn't mean to kill them because after all why would you deliberately destroy your own property? That sort of thing?
Or the part where it says a woman should marry her rapist?
I don’t think deep down that even true believers believe without any doubt. They just refuse to recognize the flaws in their beliefs. They are too invested in their beliefs to let any logic to seep in.
All the big rich preachers absolutely don’t believe but they get rich off of convincing others. If they truly believed they would get rid of their money and care for the sick and poor.
I think y mom does. She's been religious all her life. She knows I'm atheist and is not OK about it but we still have a good relationship. She doesn't have anyone else and keeps praying for me. Then says she knows how I feel about it but she's going to do it anyways.
I would have thought that if you really believe in a god or deity it's down to what you make of it, you certainly don't need a religion to tell you how to believe. If you're following a religion's way of doing things you actually believe in the religion not the god they believe in.
Do you like every track of your favourite composer, singer, writer, artist etc.? Most of us pick and choose particular lyrics, music , articles, paintings, book extracts and so on whilst still favouring the creator overall..So it us with believers who reject much of Leviticus or Deuteronomy whilst favouring the Gospels and the purported sayings of Jesus calling for love of neighbour and turning the other cheek.
yes every track of the grateful dead minus 2nd & 3rd lp
Cherry pickers get on my nerve. I think 100% believers even have self doudts.
There are people who believe in and attempt to live all 613 commandments in the bible. They are called Orthodox Jews.
My wife claims to be a believer, and I know she loves me. I don’t think she actually believes though. She doesn’t attend mass, and she never tries to talk me into believing, even though according to her religion, I’m destined for hell. I know she’d try to save me from eternal torture if she actually thought it was true.
I don't believe in any organized Religion. I just think there may be a God.
All I can say is there either must be a lot of cognitive dissonance out there, or a lot of very ignorant individuals.
I don't rule out "something". I just don't think organized religions have any more of a clue than I do. I feel like the origin of life is way above my ability to comprehend. It's a chicken and egg thing.
The chicken and egg thing may be so very damned stupid, but we've heard it all of our lives. Consider this. What/who was the first disease germ? How/when did the other disease germs get here? I don't think germs showed up one at a time, do you? People and animals most likely did not show up one at a time either. When the bible says they did it is to give mankind more importance than we really have.
@DenoPenno Chicken and egg. Which came first? God created everything. Who created God? It's the same analogy, reworded. Germs, chickens, God, whatever? It's why it's too complicated for me. No way of knowing. All we know is, we think we're here and we think there's a world around us. Went to school with a guy who thought it was possible that we all were a figment of his imagination. Maybe we are. How would we know?
@david75090 Maybe in his mind we are. LOL
Technically, eggs came first. Laid by dinosaurs who grew feathers over many generations to insulate against the cold. Flight came later.
Chicken and Egg - which came first? The answer is simple - it was the chicken. It has to be so because if there was an egg and no chicken to lie on it and keep it warm we would end up with no life being developed in the egg. So the egg first scenario does not work.
@Stig Chickens come from eggs. Either the chicken just materialized or the egg did. At the start of that species.
I really don't think it is beyond your ability or any atheists ability. You might want to read the book Origin by Dan Brown. Life came about by chemical competition before it was even alive.
@david75090 Chickens come from eggs? Really?
@HumanistSinger And who created the chemicals? It's all a circle. One of many. Which came first? Who knows?
@Stig John Prine said, "rooster laying chickens, chickens laying eggs..."
Where do your chickens come from?
@david75090 If all the chicken laid an egg and then all the chicken died - then all the eggs would would likely not hatch because the were not kept warm enough and even if they did hatch would have no mom to keep then warm and teach them what to eat and stay safe and the species would be gone. If all the chicken laid an egg and all the eggs were lost - the chicken would lay another egg and everything continues as we know it - no big deal except a set of chicken were lost. No which is the more likely scenario to be true and therefore the currently best theory - that the chicken came first. This is logical, reasonable and demonstrable and can be repeated as many times a one wants to. QED.
Wikipedia has the history of evolution of the egg which explains how the first lizards developed to create eggs that could survive out of the water. [en.wikipedia.org]. One could move on to the question what came first - the lizard or the egg that survives in water - but I don't intend to go into that here.
I suppose that anyone who do not think this is the leading theory is welcome to present a better one or retract to the position of "I don't know". All fair. If there is a better theory I would love to hear it.
@Stig Opinion. Anyone/everyone can have one. Nothing definitive. That first lizard. That first egg. Where did it come from? Formed out of air? Created? Who made the air? Who created the creator? Unknowable. No one can offer or prove the definitive explanation.
@david75090 You are right that the big explanation of everything does not exist for any atheist - but the religious people will not agree with that. That does not mean we can't have really good theories about certain elements of existence. Like we believe to know a lot about our own solar system but have to recognize we know very little about the most remote galaxies discovered in the last 20 years.
In times of stress or times of pain, I think we all become weak and dependant. We ask for someone to help us, or relieve us of our pain, find yourself talking to someone, but really your just talking to yourself and hoping that you don't start answering too.
Got a wolfpack theory.
Wolves are very social creatures like humans. If a wolf gets rejected from the pack, he becomes a lone wolf, a wolf who can not survive without the pack and dies.
Most humans think this same way, except a lone wolf human can survive without the pack, as a strong individual.
A person will ignores many moral or unethical issues , for his stronger desires to be with his social pack, that would be religious.
For me, my desire is to not live a lie. That has been stronger than to be with most of the world population who are Religious packs of being hippocrites, based on fear.
@kasmian
Dogs, wolves and humans are much closer related socially than you would think. Many cases humans and dogs have closer bonds like ultimate love, loyalty and friendship. When a dog joins a human family, he will fight to the death to protect from an outcast intruders as they would with their own pack of dogs or wolves. Wolves are second to human for territorial ownership for hunting and exploring on earth.
I could learn by simplifying how a human ought to be living from the Tree of survival of law of nature rather than. A fairytale of the Tree of life made up of laws for greed control by many monotheism Religions. Like when the homo sapiens who came across another tribe who dresses and grunts differently so they killed them, so where Religion was born.
Human are far overrated in their over ego world. If their comunication to create allies when associating those labels are advanced. Why would they kill 83℅ of the mammal on earth and half of the plant life. In my books, humans are a failed species of animals. Take the age of the earth into a year calendar. Man has lived on earth for 10 minutes wail an octopus or jelly fish has live on earth for 4 months.