There is a lot of very interesting research about the psychological roots of our political leanings, much of it from Robert Altemeyer. But others are picking up where he left off and finding some interesting data. For instance, one of the key differences now discovered is how widely we extend our concern for others.
New research on compassion is de-bunking the myth that liberal voters might inherently be more empathetic and kind-hearted people than conservatives. In fact, previous studies have shown that conservatives and liberals are equally generous with their money and their time, they just dole it out in different ways.
Some of Waytz’s forthcoming research provides even more evidence that conservatives can be just as compassionate as liberals. His findings suggest that conservatives are simply more likely to extend that empathy only to their kin.
Liberal and conservative are, politically at least, relative terms. In Australian politics Bernie Sanders would be a center RIGHT moderate with wet economic leanings. Yet we remain a functioning democracy with a market capitalist economy.
Disgust tolerance has been show to predict political affiliation with very high accuracy. The more easily disgusted you are, you more likely you're pulling for the red team. All other factors and beliefs may just be assimilated viewpoints that people defend once they find themselves on a particular team.
This is been my observation. I grew up in a politically conservative environment and the same people who use racist slang and denigrate super poor people will also donate their last $10 to a fund raiser for one of their own kind
They will also babysit, give rides, and many other kind things which is probably why we can't get through to them about some issues. They really are "nice" people if you are one of them
"Empathy only to their kin" sounds like a similar mindset to not caring about a particular disease unless they get it themselves.
I've been to a seminar of professor Hibbing. The most interesting pieces to me are the in vs out group psychology as well as the actual brain scans that show how true conservatism causes excessive stimulation of the fight/flight receptors and link to emotional non-fact based decision-making. For example, the ability to set aside the fact that a candidate is an accused child molester for the sake of voting for someone who would make sure the second amendment was upheld.
Wow, fascinating!
hippie-chick I can't follow any of this at all but for some weird reason I am loving it
@jacpod Oh I know!! I gleaned the idea of it and it made me feel good. Took some time to process it. My neurons aren't firing as fast as they used to and that's way out of my usual area.
This study is absolutely on target. Conservatives are much more tribal in their concern for people. They tend to care only for those who share their cultural beliefs and/or skin color In other words, they are inherently bigots, but simply cannot admit it. They are people who lack the moral courage to see themselves as they are.
You see the tendency of tribalism in how they deal with violators of the group's trust (violence, deviant behavior, criminal, abuse). Conservatives are much more likely to forgive or make excuses for the misdeeds. Liberals are more likely to throw the bastard under the bus!
"...suggest that conservatives are simply more likely to extend that empathy only to their kin." That would hardly be helpful to society as a whole.
"According to the experts who study political leanings, liberals and conservatives do not just see things differently. They are different—in their personalities and even their unconscious reactions to the world around them. For example, in a study published in January, a team led by psychologist Michael Dodd and political scientist John Hibbing of the University of Nebraska–Lincoln found that when viewing a collage of photographs, conservatives' eyes unconsciously lingered 15 percent longer on repellent images, such as car wrecks and excrement—suggesting that conservatives are more attuned than liberals to assessing potential threats."
In an unpublished study, participants first indicated whether they considered themselves “very conservative” or “very liberal”on a scale from 1 to 7. Then they were asked to report how empathetic they felt towards different groups. Conservatives tended to agree with statements like “I often have tender, concerned feelings for my family members who are less fortunate than me.”
The liberal study subjects more frequently reported feeling that same tenderness toward less fortunate people in general, beyond those in their own families.
This fits with previous studies that show conservatives are extremely tribal and view outsiders as threats. They will be compassionate and even empathetic, but only to those they consider part of their tribe. That’s why racism, homophobia and misogyny are so much more common on the right, because they draw their tribes so narrowly and view anyone who is outside their circle as a serious threat to everything they hold dear. They are far more likely, studies show, to react with fear to outsiders than liberals are.