I don't understand why you call him a loser if, despite significant losses, he managed to live well and become president of the United States for one term.
And do not jump to conclusions. Dry statistics with losses and profits can be very deceptive. No one knows what was going on outside of accounting and tax books.
I'm not saying that it's worth taking an example from him. But he was not afraid to take risks and taking risks. A year ago, I decided to invest. At first, I didn't succeed, but then I turned to a financial advisor helping me with financial goals personally.
And I realized that only self-confident people ready to lose could achieve something in business.

I think most people in the know, know this. Daddy's money got him out of trouble. Besides why would anyone want a billionaire for president especially one who complains about how the rich are taking over the country (as do many of his fans (sheep)?

I did read when he was first put up for election, that in total, all his business ventures that he inherited, had made less than bank interest rates in his time. Which is about as failed in business as you can get without going broke. So why did all those people say, it will be great to have a business man for potus, when the qualification , "failed business man", was just waiting to be said.

Please keep in mind, it appears that his companies lost money. They lost because he transferred income to himself (covered by tax doges as necessary). Losses fell to investors, but he profited.

Big mouth, tiny acumen...and other things, I hear......

It is pretty hard to lose money when you are running the gambling game, but he managed to do that at least twice.

That's why he sucks in the Russian money in return for favors. No bank here would lend him anything.

Doesn't surprise me

And he's still the biggest loser!

Still the biggest loser, on all counts.