If the point of the video is to say that Jesus as depicted in the Bible is not real, I can accept it - I already came to that conclusion. But it doesn't prove that someone who actually lived had these attribute assigned to him likely (if this is what happened) because the signs and attributes make Jesus of the Bible meet all the requirements of a savior among all the people from this region. Apparently, adopting beliefs and diety between cultures was common. Several traditional Judeo-Christian beliefs can be traced back into other religions of other cultures.

Excellent!!!

Jesus as found in the traditional stories, may have been a fictional creation intended either as a deception as a metaphor or both, a muddled piece of reportage based on one individual, or ditto based on several compounded individuals, or a myth based on old traditional stories lazily linked to a single name, but not perhaps from a single source. It could, most likely, be a combination of all of those things.

What is certain however is that after all this time and given the muddled nature of the very doubtful evidence, is that, anyone who thinks that they can untangle the truth about what happened, briefly, in a minor country, on the edge of civilization, and at the beginning of history, is deluding themselves. This quite old idea, therefore can not be said to be either true or false, though it does throw yet another, quite plausible stick on to the pile. Though it has also to be said, that a lot of the issues of the nativity etc. only appear in Matthew and Luke, and are almost certainly late additions.

"Jesus of Nazareth" is almost surely a way to say "John Doe, from Nowhere" in rabbi though

A plausible origin for the religious fairy tales.

It is a scientific axiom you cannot prove a negative! How about a nice hobby, like knitting or stamp collecting, instead of wasting your life on such claptrap?

I could spend all afternoon poking holes through this "proof".

This isn't very well done, and some of it is N O N S E Q U I T U R.
I just keep it simple, I don't believe it.
Atheist with theological backgrounds have dismissed most of the Sun worshiping theories from Zeitgeist as seriously lame, and this is just carbon copy Zeitgeist paste Zeitgeist and that just sucks.
It's not enough to dismiss religion and dogma, it is important to look for competence in all data.
My atheism isn't a social club like Fox News, it's a personal quest for truth and competent information.
This video is no better than religion itself, just an opposing argument that was at best a flawed hypothesis.
Misinformation is my enemy, Christianity is my enemy because it is a carrier of misinformation, the toxic isn't the God stuff, it's all the lies, remove all the lies and the God stuff is gone too.

D.M. Murdock in her books sumerized the same thing.