Who else is Conservative fiscally but Liberal on social issues? Because I feel alone when it comes to this issue.
You can't be fiscally conservative while being socially liberal. You want liberty for yourself but refuse to share it with others.
That’s the small-r republican I was raised, and originally registered. Oregon Republicans were fiscally conservative and socially aware. Reagan turned me into a Carter Republican. And when the radical wrong purged the party of moderates, I went Democrat - and have never looked back..
I prefer every adult can live as they see fit, helping the less fortunate, but am hugely in favor of the death penalty....what would you call that? BTW I HATE labels!
You, sir....are not alone. Libertarians lean towards this mind set. But I find most want less government intrusion on business matters so that commerce can exist unfettered by union demands & that is where they lose me. Who takes care of those unable to function in society? & who pays for it & how? Libertarians say sink or swim. I am a solid union woman.
Exactly. I am always suspicious of people who don't support unions.
And I always get a chuckle out of how Libertarians completely ignore the 16th Amendment in order to claim that "taxation is theft!".
I am Conservative Fiscally but Liberal on Social Issues. I like stands on both sides.
PROGRESSIVE
CONSERVATIVE
I am liberal of social issues, but also believe that we need to reduce the national debt -- by raising taxes on the rich and on corporations, not by cutting needed programs.
So unlike the OP, you are not a fiscal conservative. You hold a consistent, progressive world view.
Taxes on corporate income? On what besides that?
Conserving the capitalist system is a no starter. It has not proven to take care of long term needs of its citizens.
If you are a fearful and dogmatic conservative or a foolish and dogmatic liberal, you lose.
I am a sometimes angry and dogmatic progressive and have to be careful or I will lose.
Lose what?
Dogmatism is not synonymous with using political ideologies to interpret your world view.
@LovinLarge Lose what? Some political activism will tell you.
That’s dogmatism in your opinion. Try “...to express your world view”.
@yvilletom I've been politically active for decades, even worked in politics for several years.
So far in this thread, you have been sarcastic, avoided questions, been condescending toward someone whose background you are unfamiliar, made an unsupported factual claim and alleged dogmatism without support. Apparently you have nothing of value to contribute to this thread.
@LovinLarge Period.
Fiscal conservatism does not provide the revenue base to support a liberal social infrastructure. You want the benefits of liberalism on social issues without having to pay for them. It doesn't work that way.
LL, I don’t see dogmatism in your comment.
@yvilletom I'm sorry, I don't follow. I am increasingly having difficulty understanding communication limited to text.
Since the OP lives in Canada, the most obvious example is that he enjoys the effective and efficient benefit of universal healthcare but such benefit offends fiscal conservatives as the single largest budget item for every province.
@LovinLarge Text-limited communication is all I have but I will try.
In the USA universal health care would be the largest budget item, so we won’t have universal health care.
@yvilletom Please clarify your comments on dogmatism. Were you being sarcastic?
@yvilletom Also, the projected cost of universal healthcare in the US would not overtake the current military expenditure.
@LovinLarge No.
@LovinLarge Projected by whom and including or excluding what?
@yvilletom You ask me to support my position with evidence when you took the first position without supporting it with evidence? That is rich. Zero interest interest in continuing to interact with you.
Seems like a conflict to me...
I also see no dogmatism in yours.
@yvilletom nor I in yours...