Agnostic.com

8 11

LINK 50 Years of Tax Cuts For The Rich Failed To Trickle Down, Economic Study Says.

DUH...

Tax cuts for the wealthy have long drawn support from conservative lawmakers and economists who argue that such measures will "trickle down" and eventually boost jobs and incomes for everyone else. But a new study from the London School of Economics says 50 years of such tax cuts have only helped one group — the rich.

The new paper, by David Hope of the London School of Economics and Julian Limberg of King's College London, examines 18 developed countries — from Australia to the United States — over a 50-year period from 1965 to 20. The study compared countries that passed tax cuts in a specific year, such as the U.S. in 1982 when President Ronald Reagan slashed taxes on the wealthy, with those that didn't, and then examined their economic outcomes.

Per capita gross domestic product and unemployment rates were nearly identical after five years in countries that slashed taxes on the rich and in those that didn't, the study found.

HippieChick58 9 Jan 23
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

8 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

No surprise here.

1

Trickle down has been a piece of self-serving propaganda for the wealth for generations and still there are those that continue to tout this BS. In the end tax cuts, especially for the wealthy, only harm the economy and promote the wide disparity in incomes we see today.

2

I knew this long before this study was done. (

2

The rich have been scamming America by electing Republican stooges and ripping off the poor and middle class.

2

When money is given to the unemployed, the homeless, the people who either do not or cannot make a living from their labor, the economy improves as that money gets circulated within the community and the economy in general. When the rich get the money it goes into an account in a foreign land where it is not circulating through the economy and this not doing any good to the society at large.

3

We need a major tax break for anyone making less than $300,000 a year and then a slight increase at $500,000 then incrementally up to 90% for anyone earning over a billion a year.
It's where all the money is.

In the US today no one needs a tax break. We already have one of if not the lowest personal income tax among the developed nations. However, we do need more of a truly progressive tax for the wealthy who often hire expensive attorneys to pay little or no taxes. Hell, if that money was paid to the IRS instead of tax lawyers we would be better off.

3

Thre decline of the middle class in America started under Reagan and his supply side economics, which was only a glorified trickle down scam.

5

Did we really need another study to Know this? To quote H.W Bush, "It's Voodoo economics"..

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:571457
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.