I understand that LGBTQ is not a sin but how many people view it as unnatural?
Homosexuality isn't a mistake of nature, not a change in the genetic code, and not a psychological illness or trauma. Human homosexuality is as common as animal homosexuality. Few people know this exists in nature, not only with us but with an intelligent species. Anyone can be gay and doesn't need to be accused of something or try to cure it. An absolute gay who isn't bisexual, of course, can live his whole life with a partner of the other sex and even have kids. But psychologically, it'll be hard for him, I think. In his place, I'd constantly had thoughts of suicide. And I'm glad that now people are more sexually literate and begin realizing their sexual needs much earlier. It's very important to study inclusive language resources that help to study this topic.
I used to believe that there were no dumb questions, I stand corrected.
Looks like a troll to me. But I'll play.
Bait with a ridiculous loaded question, and turn off the app until you're a level 5. I see you playa.
I don't understand why you thought this question would fall under "Silly, Random & Fun"?
Newbie or troll.
All lovers can be silly random and fun .... but not my category choice here.... I am not gay but appreciate both gay men and any woman wanting to love me.... what is most natural is what our eyes desire our taste enjoys our nose leads and our ears hear lovers asling for love
None of your beeswax.....why, exactly, do you give a rat's ass?
Jason Collins and Jarron Collins are identical twins. They have exactly the same genetic makeup.
Jason Collins is gay.
Jarron Collins is straight.
Therefore we cannot conclude that being gay or being straight is 100% genetic. It's a function of both genetics and environment.
There are even more aspects to Nature than genetics and environment.
Can I ask what you mean by 'environment' in this context?
Homosexuality, & other variations, are found in many different animal species, including ours. Can't get more "natural" than that. There is a spectrum, especially among humans, of where one falls sexually/gender-wise (I doubt it's a simple bell-curve, but it won't be a strictly either/or). Also, how some people view this (& I can't believe a few have voted "unnatural"!) really doesn't matter as they should tend to their own knitting (pun intended). Sorta like just 'cause someone "believes" in Jehovah, or that vaccines cause autism doesn't make it true.
Hell, I "believe" that those that find gender/sexual fluidity as unnatural are quite unnatural.
Also, this poll was phrased incorrectly as pointed out by @ChestRockfield.
@MsKathleen Not interchangeable. You have a square/ rectangle situation. Everything that's genetic is natural, but not everything that's natural is genetic.
Fix your poll; that's not a yes or no question.