Agnostic.com

8 9

LINK Survey: 40% of parents won’t get their child a COVID-19 vaccine

By Virginia Langmaid, CNN

New survey results published Tuesday by the Kaiser Family Foundation indicate that 43% of parents of children under 5 in the U.S. say they will not get their child vaccinated against COVID-19, the highest percentage in the year that KFF's Vaccine Monitor survey has been asking the question.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration authorized COVID-19 vaccinations in children as young as 6 months in mid-June.

According to the KFF data, only 17% of parents of children between 6 months and 5 years old say their child has been vaccinated or will be as soon as possible. Another 27% say they will wait and see how well the shots work in other kids, and 13% said they will vaccinate their child only if required to do so for school or child care.

Although the percentage of parents unwilling to vaccinate children in this age group is high, it is not much lower in other age groups. According to the survey, 37% of parents of a child 5 to 11 and 28% of parents of a child 12 to 17 say they will not get them vaccinated against COVID-19.

Parents' responses varied significantly when broken down by partisanship and vaccination status. Just 21% of Democrat-leaning parents said they would not vaccinate their young child, compared with 64% of Republican-leaning parents. The survey found 27% of vaccinated parents said they would not vaccinate their child, compared with 64% of unvaccinated parents.

Concerns over side effects
"Concerns over the safety of the vaccines and potential side effects are widespread among parents of unvaccinated children ages 6 months through 4 years old," the report's authors wrote.

More than 8 in 10 parents of unvaccinated young children said they were concerned about serious side effects and about unknown long-term effects. Majorities of vaccinated parents of unvaccinated children also had these concerns.

While concerns about long-term effects and side effects were common across demographic lines, white parents reported fewer logistical concerns around vaccinating their young children. More than 4 in 10 Black parents expressed concern over taking time off work for vaccination, and 45% of Hispanic parents said they were concerned about getting their child vaccinated from a trusted provider.

Some cities are discussing returns to indoor masking. Here's what you need to know

Interest in vaccine education
The survey data also shows room for improvement on vaccine education and a possible opportunity to get unvaccinated children vaccinated. More than half of parents of young children said they felt that government information around vaccinating their child was confusing. Nearly 40% of parents of unvaccinated children said they did not have enough information on where to find a vaccine.

"Across income groups, a majority of parents with household incomes of at least $90,000 say they think the information from federal health agencies about vaccinating children under 5 is clear, while majorities of those with lower incomes say it is confusing," the authors said.

One-time vaccination clinics were popular for adult vaccinations, but many parents of unvaccinated children are considering vaccination alongside regular medical appointments.

"Most parents of children under five newly eligible for the vaccine say they have not spoken to their pediatricians or other health care provider about the vaccine for their child," the authors wrote, and most of those parents say they will have that discussion at their child's next visit.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services recommends that infants and young children see a physician at 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 3 years and 4 years old.

HippieChick58 9 July 27
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

8 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

There's talk about offering "segregated" classrooms, meaning masked and unmasked. Since it's currently a choice by parents whether to send their kids to school with a mask or not. A masked kid is only half as protected in a classroom of unmasked kids - compared to a masked kid in a fully vaccinated classroom.

From what I understand, it's not so much of a concern that the kids will get super sick, but that they will spread it and get their family members sick, and many of these kids live in multi-generational homes with adults working with visitors (in hospitality or food service) and businesses are super short staffed as it is... So, something to consider for some communities.

No talk about segragating by vaccination status. Both my grandchildren were vaxxed and boosted and caught covid while traveling to Europe. They did not get very sick and recovered quickly. My daughter was less vaccinated, not boosted and had a more severe case, but still recovered within a week. Pretty sure their sicknesses would have been worse had they not been vaccinated at all. While vaccination might not keep kids from contracting the virus, they will not have as severe illness, or for as long and presumably would not be as contagious for as long as the totally un-vaccinated.

1

Fine! It's Darwinian.

2

I wonder if this will cause more teachers will leave the profession so they don't have to risk getting infected by their students.

MizJ Level 8 July 27, 2022
1

Criminal to encourage any childhood medicine without 5 years of data behind it. 5 years of data to determine if there is any real benefit to the child ie compare with non-vaccinated, determine how many doses "recommended" (hopefully not the same as the last paragraph's frequency), determine if the medicine is safe long term. A thorough analysis of all factors.
Then and only then should a commercial product be recommended by government departments.
Consent means informed consent and parents need to know there is no long term data available as there is with other real vaccines.

How any parent can do a risk Vs benefit analysis and decide to give these covid medicines to a child under 5 is beyond me.

puff Level 8 July 27, 2022

There are hundreds of vaccines given before there is 5 years worth of data. How are you going to get 5 years of data if no one takes the vaccine. I personally don't think we have time to wait. I want the munchkins vaccinated NOW, especially if they are in school or day care. Childhood is germy enough, they need all the protection they can get.

@HippieChick58 thalidomide.
Released on the public before fully approved ie 5 years of testing/ trials/ data, then the manufacturer is not liable. I'm not about to do their marketing for them to use under 5's as test cases..
which in 2022 is normal, no-one is liable excepting Russia/ Russians of course.
Your child can still contribute to science as you need 25% control group, no vax, in trials. How else do you know if it works as the manufacturers claim?

3

I've said it before....germ-infested little vermin, in all centuries previous to vaccines, they died in droves under the age of 5.

3

Who is the retarded 60%???

3

Math impairment is also a pandemic

5

Really bad parental decision-making.

That seems to be rampant in this world.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:678691
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.