Agnostic.com
4 11

Dawkins is brilliant

tinebean 7 Jan 29
Share
You must be a member of this group before commenting. Join Group

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

4 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

I don't know if it's even brainwashing or vanity, instinct is generally very impulsive. And persistent.

alliwant Level 7 Jan 29, 2019
2

I fully agree. Procreating isn't an altruistic act. The breeders of the world, by and large, tell the childless that we're selfish for choosing to forego parenthood. Don't get me wrong — there's a real benefit to me in terms of finances and stress by not having kids. But there's also a huge moral imperative, I think, in not bringing a person into the world that necessarily can't consent to its own existence.

resserts Level 8 Jan 29, 2019

How does one gain consent from an unborn non-being, though?

@misternatureboy That's my point: consent can't be given, so it is not within my rights to impose life on another.

@resserts So, in a truly ethical world, life shouldn't exist?

@misternatureboy What I'm referring to doesn't apply to plants, animals, and so forth, but in terms of humans, I think I have a moral obligation to not bring life into the world. For most people, procreating is merely amoral because they've never contemplated the potential harm they're doing to a new person (as opposed to not procreating, which does no harm to the nonexistent person). I don't apply my standard to anyone other than myself, because I don't know whether others have thought it through or not. It's a moral mandate to which I hold only myself.

@resserts Gotcha. I totally see why one should decide to not procreate for ethical reasons. I wanted to understand the scope of your application. Not at Cult Level--check!

@misternatureboy Haha, no, I'm definitely not Heaven's-Gating this philosophy. ?

2

My genes aren't that special.

Sticks48 Level 9 Jan 29, 2019
4

Thank you! I've always maintained the argument that having a child to feel fulfilled is just as selfish as not having a child to have the time and money to do whatever the heck I please to feel fulfilled!

Okieboglie Level 5 Jan 29, 2019
Write Comment

Recent Visitors 40

Photos 198 More

Posted by MacStrikerWhen being selfish is better than being selfless...

Posted by MacStriker"Shop Smart, Shop S-Mart."

Posted by MacStrikerWhen people with kids say "they are an investment!" (as if it's a positive thing), this is what comes to mind...

Posted by MacStrikerA book club that only allows ONE book, seems kinda narrow...

Posted by MacStrikerKids = Party Poopers (literally)

Posted by MacStrikerNone is better than one!

Posted by MacStrikerThose Ungrateful Crotch-Goblins!

Posted by MacStrikerI'm not saying it's right, but i understand the sentiments of the reply...

Posted by MacStriker"... it's a peaceful life..."

Posted by JGalA little late but still applies every day.

Posted by MacStrikerAll the crotch goblins giving a breather to their breeders for most of the day. SerenityNow!

Posted by UrsiMajorWell, I guess this beats a pregnancy positive.

Posted by KojaksmomIt might work!

Posted by UrsiMajorYou're welcome

Posted by MacStrikerThe struggle is real

Posted by Tejas0123456789

  • Top tags#kids #children #parents #friends #world #hope #sex #video #mother #babies #cats #religious #religion #hell #god #birth #death #atheism #dogs #society #memes #truth #reason #church #hello #community #bullshit #movies #Christian #Bible #comic #humans #existence #relationship #book #pregnancy #evidence #smoke #midwest #wife #government #addiction #population #money #empathy #Atheist #agnostic #animals #fox #cancer ...

    Members 250Top

    Moderator