Agnostic.com
5 5

Supreme Court justice Clarence calls Obergefell vs Hodges--marriage equality ruling-- "a demonstrably incorrect precedent. He appears to be trying to lay out an excuse to revisit the case in hopes of overturning it.

I confess I am thinking not very kind thoughts about him right now.

[lgbtqnation.com]

MikeInBatonRouge 8 June 23
Share
You must be a member of this group before commenting. Join Group

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Justice Clarence is a demonstrably incorrect n$gger. I hope he reads that and gets offended.

rainmanjr Level 8 June 26, 2019
0

THESE PEOPLE are afraid it's catching.

2

Now? That fucker is and has been despicable even before he was nominated!

Mofo1953 Level 9 June 23, 2019
1

One of the worst appointments to the court ever. He pretty much just takes up space.

Sticks48 Level 9 June 23, 2019

@AncientNight I wasn't talking best or worst. I was talking most useless. 🙂

1

I'm trying to understand this. Stare decisis is about determining what's lawful according to precedent and this judge seems to be saying that some legal decisions in the past were not of the type that can be used as precedents. If that's right, I wonder how a person would know what type a legal decision is.

brentan Level 8 June 23, 2019

I had a similar thought. Clearly some past decisions don't stand the test of time as cultural understanding of human rights changes, but based on what? Thomas said the Obergefell decission was "demonstrably incorrect" but without stating by what factual basis he makes that claim. Remember, that decision is only 6 years old.
Thomas is particularly offensive to me, and should be to any self-respecting secularist, because he champions the idea of "natural law" as a legal guiding principle. That basically equates to him saying that some areas of human conduct are, and should be, ruled by divine creator's master plan, which, of course, he thinks he gets to define, based on his personal Christian paradigm for what "truth" is. The man is a Dominionist, deeply sexist and anti-lgbtq, and reprehensible.

Write Comment

Recent Visitors 23

Photos 272 More

Posted by snytiger6Hundreds of love letters between two gay men during WWII ...

Posted by snytiger6All for love and ...

Posted by snytiger6Being gay is not a sin ...

Posted by snytiger6Bigot Bird ...

Posted by snytiger6Pride is important ...

Posted by snytiger6Coming out ...

Posted by snytiger6Larissa awakens Christmas morning to find ...

Posted by CliffordCook([iowafaithleadercoalition.

Posted by snytiger6Victoria's Secret model, huh ...

Posted by snytiger6I come in peace ...

Posted by snytiger6You need to find peace with your uniqueness...

Posted by snytiger6The only choice made was to be myself...

Posted by snytiger6The day you graduate from...

Posted by snytiger6Trust me. There is no other man...

Posted by snytiger6The bible belt...

Posted by snytiger6Condiment come out...

  • Top tags#gay #video #transgender #community #friends #god #sex #gender #hope #DonaldTrump #religion #LGBT #world #religious #rights #relationship #queer #Christian #nation #marriage #children #kids #money #laws #Atheist #church #parents #hello #reason #book #wife #ComingOut #dogs #Catholic #Jesus #Bible #Identity #films #Song #movies #Police #republicans #atheism #vote #death #society #culture #homosexuality #Christians #mother ...

    Members 987Top

    Moderator