I mostly identify as a non-conformist, but could also loosely identify with a few other descriptive names, one of them being an anarcho capitalist. People need to remember all things in moderation, and I find both the left and right political sides to be too pushy and demanding. Free markets when operated like they should produce free citizens who can live fully independent lives free of government regulation. I disdain the NT in the holy babble in particular because alot of what that long haired preacher guy's teachings were anti wealth and property, which there is nothing wrong with either.

I must be one (Anacrcho Capitalist). I had to look it up. LOL! I agree with the fundamental tenets, but I HATE that term. It negatively connotes it to be an out-of-control system when it would, in fact, be a self-regulating system based on a simple set of laws. I much prefer the term "Laissez Faire" capitalism, which is essentially the same thing.

I made this post in response: [agnostic.com]

Oh, and it was from this: Which way do you lean politically and why?

I think Bitcoin is a step in the direction of anarchocapitalism. I'm not sure that the public will ultimately buy into it, though. (Pardon the pun.) I think the main point of libertarianism is to not initiate the use of force, but to have those components of government available and ready to retard and punish the unwanted use of force initiated by others.

I will be running for congress this fall. I will not hedge from my pure libertarian ideology, but realize and advocate that the transition from where we are today to that libertarian ideal in the future should be slow and steady. The objective is to have a government that maximizes the long-term happiness of society, and it is not to have a libertarian government -- Libertarian government is the means, not the ends.

People have become dependent on today's government. They need to be weaned slowly and carefully and fairly; otherwise, great unhappiness will be created, defeating the objective.