I'm not sure I'd be classified as a skeptic. I fully believe in applying scientific methodology to answer any question. I'm a proponent of the application of inductive and deductive logic to any situation. But I have an open mind to all possibilities.
I think we'll both fit in to this group -- good to see you.
I also think I agree with your position. Being a skeptic doesn't mean taking a position that everything unproven is by definition False. Being a skeptic means that everything is conditional pending the acquisition of supporting evidence.
Likewise proving anything True in an absolute sense is impossible. Things can just be well supported.
We can accumulate evidence that indicates things are likely or unlikely -- sometimes very likely or unlikely.
We also must go through life deciding which questions are worthy of our energy.
One of my favorite quotes says:
"Do not believe anything, but question only what is worth questioning". -- George Polya
Posted by Observer-EffectAlright . . . this is a harsh picture to look at, but does it show nudity?
Posted by FrostyJimDon't believe what you think you saw...
Posted by SunishineI don't give off visible light, so...
Posted by SunishineEssential oils crisis
Posted by SunishineDon't step in that!
Posted by SunishineWho built it?
Posted by SunishineO-o-o-o-o-o-o!
Posted by SunishineSkeptic Baby
Posted by UmbralAnyone subscribe?
Posted by UmbralClimate Deniers Are More Likely to Hate Democracy If you care strongly about climate change, you’re most likely to be someone passionate about democracy.
Posted by UmbralThis one is gouda.
Posted by JeffBHere is a guild to help your health.
Posted by UmbralSo sad and needless.
Posted by CuriousCreatureNational Society of Skeptics
Posted by SunishineNo, no, please continue. ..
Posted by JimGSomething you can use when necessary.