I subscribe to the Michael Shermer interpretation that mores are survivable traits passed down through culture. Religion is incidental. These mores will either survive or die off due to reinforcement from the group, be it positive or negative reinforcement. Religion may assert influence, but its success is still determined by the group at large.

Humanity has never needed religion to define right and wrong. Especially given that religion is one of the most fucked up, and usually "wrong about everything" belief systems man has ever created.

Reciprocity and empathy will do it.

Religion has little to do with it, or no priests would be pedophiles, methinks.
Hurting others is wrong.
Stealing is wrong.
Lying, cheating, for gain is wrong.
I need no Gawd to tell me that!

In simple utilitarian terms the test is does it maximize happiness or alternatively (negatively) does it minimize suffering. Every choice requires its own calculation.

If you can't tell the difference from right from wrong, you don't lack religion, you lack empathy.

I like the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a good description of what ought to be right or wrong.

Non-religious people still know that doing things that don't harm the environment and others is good. No need to imagine an invisible being to slavishly obey.

By the way, this website has a bit of a learning curve.

For members who are open to dating, you will see that certain thumbnails and profiles have a heart symbol on them with a percentage. This identifies which members are open to dating, and the percent shows approximately how compatible you are with them. If you click the heart symbol on the top of their profile, you can see how it is determined.

You can improve your score in general by answering all the profile questions and writing a bio, which also earns you website points.

Commenting on posts and writing your own earns more points. At level two you can private message people, and at level eight you get an agnostic T-shirt.

The website uses profile algorithms to find member matches, so the more details one includes, the better the match.

Many people prefer to see a written profile talking about interests, hobbies, and backgrounds that can be quickly perused to find compatible partners.

In case you didn't know yet, to find members near you, click on the "Browse" button at the top of the page, then on "Members," and enter your preferred search parameters.
Click on the "Discuss" button, then "Nearby" to find members near you also.
Or click on the "About" button at the top left of the page to find links to FAQ or the website tutorial.
Points are now being given to level 3+ members who chat. You can see chat rooms on the group main page or at [agnostic.com].

Religions, tradition and culture have always defined what is right and what is wrong based on the collective interests of the people in power. That doesn't make those determinations correct. I'm not sure about your assertion that "few people and the social media" define that now. And to say something like "slavery to great imaginations", what the fuck does that even mean? I dunno, you don't kill people, you don't fuck people over, and everyone deserves a chance and support without judgment. I don't feel like a slave for thinking that. You do, maybe? I'd think this one through more if i were you.

Doing 'what's right' is pretty basic. We make those choices everyday, most times without thinking. Treating people with respect and kindness. Don't take things that don't belong to you. I believe that the reason religion was created was to control people. I suppose there will always be part of society that will not "do what is right" You can always find a way to justify your behavior if you so choose.

You do. Each of us does for ourselves. And whilst yes that makes it entirely subjective, building a consensus helps us function better as a social species.