I still say I Do NOT Care which woman any man is "doing"...Kennedy, FDR, etc etc. As long as it is consensual & between adults. What has that ever had to do with job competence?!

While I am not going to take on defending Bill Clinton, I will say that, in the interview I saw a couple of days ago,(if that is the one you are referring to) Hillary did not bring this up again. The interviewer asked for her take on the Monica affair and she gave her answer. That is a little different to 'bringing this up again'.

why pick on clinton? did eisenhower not have a position of power over his chauffeur, with whom he had an affair? did jfk not screw everything that wiggled when it walked? no, one doesn't justify the others, but it is curious that congress didn't go after any of them... until clinton, and they worked hard to get the goods on him too. as for accusations of rape, i tend to believe the women... unless i can SEE someone working so hard to get the goods on a guy (and a woman -- the smear against hillary began long before the white house). logic. and if we are concerned about all of this is ANY way, why are we not focusing on someone who is not only currently in power and accused by, what is it, 19 women now? not of having a consensual affair in which the power dynamic may have been an issue, but of violent rape followed by threats, and surrounding himself with people who are an awful lot like him. is he not a more urgent consideration? or do we hearken back a bit in order to avoid dealing with that?

g

I am about as far left as you can get, and I absolutely never defended him. What I hate most is the hypocrisy of those who pursued the case so aggressively.

I guess that Hillary thinks that every boss in America should be allowed to have sex with adult subordinates.