Agnostic.com

8 2

The world today is changing, and sometimes, not in a positive way. I was thinking today, which sometimes gets me in trouble. My thoughts told me that it is strange that people today are loved solely for acquiring fame, whereas in the past, people were famous for being loved and adored.

SoullessHeathen 5 Dec 4
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

8 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Being very materialistic too,grabbing all the expensive "Toys",Cars,house,boats,maybe an airplane,but it matters not,we all one day will have our last day or night,I suppose the best way to go is in your sleep,then no heroic efforts to keep you alive......

I agree, a life of accumulation is meaningless, as you take nothing with you on that last day. It just becomes someone else's burden

0

Oi, you kids. Humans are exactly the same as they've ever been. This is nothing new, you've only just caught on.

1

Today we have the technology to become world famous for no reason. The cult of fame has almost certainly been around for at least 4.5 million years.

1

I don't see how the modern world is substantively different in terms of worshiping celebrity. Hollywood has been around for over a hundred years now, for example.

Sometimes I think we get older and wiser and therefore more observant and we just see the emptiness and perfidy beneath the surface, and think something other than our own perceptions has actually changed. Because it's easier to accept that things are going to hell rather than that they've always been hell, and worse, we didn't recognize it until now.

Of course some things have changed; we've definitely become less ideologically homogeneous and even more ideologically polarized since the 1980s, for example. But even that is the result of a good development, which is that people are disassociating from religion and that just creates the problem that we've got to settle on an alternative social "glue" and come to understand our common humanity apart from some specious concept of "good" vs "sinful".

1

I’m almost 50 years old and I can tell you that I’ve witnessed a change from when having respect for who you were and whatever your talents were as well as having substance has fallen away.

And has sadly been replaced with wealth and controversy. And I say controversy because that has become the new fame. It’s no longer are you skilled or inspiring but instead are you shameless and willing to sacrifice your own image for money and acknowledgement.

So yeah I definitely get what you’re saying and there are those behind this ideology that for some don’t want us to have leaders or at least people who are worth following.
But unless there’s a great awakening amongst our society it might just eventually be unlawful to be one of those people.

1

The high & mighty might Think they are "adored", but only while they are "on top" and they know it! Not a choice i would make

1

"People were famous for being loved and adored" - but that only happened because they had acquired fame first. One thing feeds the other when the person who has acquired fame does something positive with it.

Bob Marley was loved and adored as a musician, before he gained any fame or notoriety, perhaps instances of exception occur on rare terms

0

That still happens but not so often as it did. People worship money and power, unfortunately.

I do not, never have, in fact, if you have enough to be comfortable you should re-distribute it! I admire the Gates, not the Cheetos of this world.........

@AnneWimsey So true, but unfortunately many people are only for themselves.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:237157
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.