Agnostic.com

5 3

One has to wonder what all the "Russiagate" liberals think about the United States' actual meddling in foreign nations

"Washington engineers right-wing coup in Venezuela"

Washington’s recognition of Guaidó as president constitutes a naked intervention by US imperialism with the aim of achieving its own predatory aims in Venezuela, which boasts the world’s largest proven oil reserves. At the same time, it is aimed at rolling back the influence in the hemisphere of Russia and China, which have both established close economic and political ties with Caracas.

This regime change operation has been two decades in the making, from the abortive 2002 CIA-orchestrated coup against Maduro’s late predecessor, Hugo Chávez, under George W. Bush, through the imposition of sanctions by the Obama administration and its designation of Venezuela as an “extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.”

By in effect throwing US support to a rival government, the Trump administration is seeking to create the conditions for a military coup or even civil war within Venezuela as well as a US military intervention from without.
...
Maduro, for all of the rhetoric about “Bolivarian Socialism,” heads a capitalist government that defends private property in Venezuela and has imposed the full burden of the country’s deep-going economic crisis onto the backs of the Venezuelan working class, whose strikes and protests have been brutally repressed. Under Maduro and his predecessor, the late Hugo Chávez, private control of the country’s economy actually grew and the profits of the financial sector soared, as the government diverted vast social wealth to meet debt payments to Wall Street and the international banks.

Nonetheless, the claims from the Trump administration that this government is “illegitimate” and that Washington is standing for “democracy” are nothing short of obscene. This same administration, it should be noted, has no problem with the legitimacy of the murderous police state monarchy of Prince Mohamed bin Salman in Saudi Arabia, the dictatorship of Gen. Sisi in Egypt or the various similar regimes that constitute Washington’s principal allies in the Middle East.

On less specious grounds than Washington is using to declare Maduro an “usurper,” any government in the world could claim that Trump’s own government—elected with less popular votes than those of his opponent and opposed by the majority of the American people—is “illegitimate” and should be overthrown.

Moreover, any regime that emerges from the US-backed operation in Venezuela will be a right-wing dictatorship of the banks, big business and foreign capital that will organize a bloodbath against the Venezuelan working class that will far eclipse the massacre carried out in 1989 against the Caracazo, the popular revolt of the country’s workers and poor against IMF austerity.

read more:
[wsws.org]

commie1776 6 Jan 24
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

My immediate reaction to this mess in Venezuela was the similarities between their last election and ours as well as the fact that the majority of Americans want Trump gone. Democracies don't work that way folks. Elections are supposed to be the way to change governments.

2

"world socialist website" is the link. Not sure about a "right wing coup" but America has meddled in elections in other countries throughout the history of the U.S. Notice America is saying Venezuela's president is illegitimate. What a laugh. America's president is illegitimate. A war would be a distraction from that.

2

I'll have to come back and read the entire article, but my initial reaction: while the language of the piece leans toward biased, my thoughts when I first heard the news were pretty similar. Now to be clear, I have NO love for the Maduro regime. His autocratic dictatorship is nothing but bad for the country and the region and he has to go. On the other hand however, this new guy (I haven't even had the chance to learn his name yet, let alone learn ANYTHING about his history, philosophy, or political agenda) just DECLARES himself President in opposition and we're cool? I understand that Maduro's reelection is widely regarded as illegitimate and rightly so, but how is self appointment any better?
I'll be following this story as it develops, but I don't want to hear any complaints of "dangerous" Venezuelans "pouring into our country" after this thing plays out.

0

Iran, Nicaragua and the entire cold war - some examples of USA meddling in foreign nation's politics. To make oil cheap in the USA, someone has to die somewhere else I guess; all in the guise of spreading democracy.

I'm not sure the agenda is to make oil cheap as much as it is to make our oil Barons richer.

2

There is a history of countries invading, usurping & manipulating the governments of other nations, tribes, land. This is our species tendency. The USA's history is replete with meddling. Maduro & Chavez has made a mess of an oil producing nation. A dictatorship will restore stability as it is the most effective manner of governing. A right wing dictatorship will be a humanitarian disaster as all of them have been. That such instability has overtaken Venezuela is a study in mismanagement. What will come in the future is disheartening as establishing stability usually requires crushing the opposition instead of negotiating a positive result.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:272651
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.