Do you always write your scripts, to fit your wider belief system? How does it end when you avoid the facts? Are you aware of nuances, double talk, stonewalling and just plain lying by people. How do you justify all that with your subject matter?

@Freedompath YAAAY, MORE PROJECTION... thanks for proving my point.

@Captain_Feelgood before you make an even worse fool of yourself...ck the meaning of the word ‘projection’ and make sure it fits with your idea.

So far, Obama's administration has zero criminal indictments, the first administration since Nixon to make it through eight years without one.

So far, Trump's personal lawyer, Cohen, has been convicted and one of Trump's campaign managers, Manifort, has been convicted. In addition others are under investigation.

These are facts, not projections.

A historian quoted in a Newsweek article said the Trump administration is the most corrupt in history. That is an opinion I share, but I am not an expert. Time will tell.

@EdEarl Like I said, now there are people in the DOJ that aren't bias (we hope) and are going to investigate Obama's admin. Unlike Mueller who hired a bunch of Trump haters to do the Russia collusion case, and still couldn't get Trump on anything. We'll see what happens.

@Captain_Feelgood I am not an Obama fan. In fact, I dislike most presidents, regardless of party. I liked Eisenhower and Jimmy Carter; otherwise, the presidents since Eisenhower were IMO criminals.

Obama is a lawyer and taught Constitutional Law. Thus, I seriously doubt anyone will ever find he broke the law. Moreover, I believe any president can become very rich after being president, without breaking the law. Thus, I believe an Obama investigation will not produce anything actionable. As you say, we will see what happens.

@EdEarl Him teaching law and being a lawyer certainly doesn't make him incapable of breaking the law. Hillary and Bill proved that on several occasions. As have many other lawyers for that matter.
No doubt, any president can get rich after serving in office, writing books, giving speeches and such. But that's not what we're talking about here. We all know Hillary lied about her emails. That whole fiasco showed her breaking more than a few laws right there. Why was she not held to the same legal standards as you and I certainly would be held to? Because the DOJ at the time was still under Democratic control, and they didn't want to mess up her chances of beating Trump. Oh well.. Things are a little different now, perhaps she will get indicted, ruining Obama's clean record. So yeah, we'll see what happens.

@Captain_Feelgood IMO he was a criminal, but he was smart, well educated in the law, and careful. thus, I think an investigation will produce nothing.

@EdEarl Perhaps. Like we said, we'll see.

@Freedompath "....ck the meaning of the word 'projection' " Not sure what '...ck' stood for, but I assure you, I was using it in the sense of claiming others (projecting) are doing the exact thing you are guilty of doing yourself. When I get caught steeling a candy bar from the store, I start screaming 'NOT ME, JIMMY THERE (pointing my finger) STEALS CANDY EVERY DAY... NOT ME'... Just like the Dems did when Hillary got caught. All of a sudden it's "DON'T LOOK OVER HERE AT HILLARY,,, UMMM... TRUMP TALKED TO THE RUSSIANS... YEAH, THAT'S IT... HE 'COLLUDED' WITH THE RUSSIANS TO CHEAT AT THE ELECTION... NOT HILLARY..." Get it? That's what projecting is. I do hope that helped you out a little... Have a great weekend.

@Captain_Feelgood it helped...when you don’t work off of proven facts, I can’t put faith in what you say. I don’t follow anywhere in the media that supports conspiracy theories, and I want follow people who do.