U.S. intelligence agencies split on Covid-19 origins, offer no high-confidence conclusions in new report
I still would like to know what freaking difference would it make?
Wars are fought over a lot less trivial things . . .
@FearlessFly Stupid wars......
sure is funny that it may have leaked from a lab receiving US aid tho, huh?
what a virus even is is the subject of quite a bit of debate, although we don't get exposed to the debate in the US...suffice it to say that Rockefeller Medicine has shut that debate down here, and they just looove the "disease comes from outside" model
Who besides me and the “agency memory”-- on paper, stamped “Top Secret” and filed -- remembers China’s response early during the long Cold War when American warhawks hinted of a nuclear response?
“China,” one of her diplomats said, “can afford to lose half of her six hundred million people in a nuclear war. Can America afford to lose as many of her three hundred million people?”
So, Dave, America’s diplomats are split on Covid’s origins because they want to preserve good relations with China.
"America’s diplomats are split"
. . . the article is about US Intelligence agencies.
@FearlessFly That’s a quibble. What else did you see in my comment?
The most bureaucratic way to say, we don't f-ing know.