Agnostic.com

4 2

U.S. intelligence agencies split on Covid-19 origins, offer no high-confidence conclusions in new report

[cnbc.com]

FearlessFly 9 Aug 27
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

4 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

I still would like to know what freaking difference would it make?

Wars are fought over a lot less trivial things . . .

@FearlessFly Stupid wars......

0

sure is funny that it may have leaked from a lab receiving US aid tho, huh?

what a virus even is is the subject of quite a bit of debate, although we don't get exposed to the debate in the US...suffice it to say that Rockefeller Medicine has shut that debate down here, and they just looove the "disease comes from outside" model

2

Who besides me and the “agency memory”-- on paper, stamped “Top Secret” and filed -- remembers China’s response early during the long Cold War when American warhawks hinted of a nuclear response?

“China,” one of her diplomats said, “can afford to lose half of her six hundred million people in a nuclear war. Can America afford to lose as many of her three hundred million people?”

So, Dave, America’s diplomats are split on Covid’s origins because they want to preserve good relations with China.

"America’s diplomats are split"

. . . the article is about US Intelligence agencies.

@FearlessFly That’s a quibble. What else did you see in my comment?

0

The most bureaucratic way to say, we don't f-ing know. 😛

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:618775
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.