Top Scientist on COVID Vaccines: “Withdraw Them Immediately”
Unequivocal safety signals for heart, blood and reproduction found in yellow card vaccine data.
Dr. Richard Ennos, a retired Professor of Evolutionary Biology at Edinburgh University, has undertaken a thorough analysis of the U.K.’s COVID-19 ‘Yellow Card’ vaccine adverse event data and found it indicates “unequivocal safety signals” for adverse reactions caused by the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines affecting the blood, the heart and female reproduction. He concludes that: “There can be no question that the mRNA vaccines should be withdrawn with immediate effect.”
In the U.K., three COVID-19 vaccines – AstraZeneca (AZ), Pfizer (PF) and Moderna – have been used in a nationwide inoculation programme aimed at preventing harm from the SARS-CoV-2 virus. All three vaccines provide the genetic code that enables vaccinees to produce within their bodies the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the molecule associated with the pathology of COVID-19. In the AZ vaccine the genetic code for the spike protein takes the form of DNA, and is introduced into recipient’s cells by a genetically modified chimpanzee virus (DNA, adenovirus vector). For the PF and MO vaccines, the introduced genetic code takes the form of heavily modified RNA, and is carried to recipient’s cells within lipid nanoparticles (mRNA, lipid nanoparticle). There is no control over either the tissues to which the vaccines are transported or the length of time for which spike proteins are produced by those tissues.
All three vaccines rely on novel technology that has never before been used in humans. At the time of their introduction, they lacked any long-term safety data, and therefore required Conditional Marketing Authorisation from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). To monitor the safety of the three vaccines the MHRA established the COVID-19 vaccine Yellow Card reporting scheme (C-19VYC). This collates standardised reports of suspected adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccines that can be analysed to detect safety signals and potentially trigger withdrawal of the vaccines. Here we show that a thorough analysis of the C-19YC data indicates unequivocal safety signals for adverse reactions caused by the mRNA vaccines PF and MO affecting the lymph system, the heart and female reproduction.
[summit.news]
GMO vaccines are not part of nature’s protocols!!!
Artificial use of RMA’s in vaccines have unknown consequences which in most cases are unknown until they disable and cause death among those who have ingested it with or without their own inclination!!!
When a so called vaccine does not contain a weaken form of the virus which our immune systems can defend against it is NOT a vaccine, it is unnatural hence more likely to cause more harm than good in the long run!!!
Clearly, there is nothing scientific in your thinking about vaccines, you have discarded every article or comment that has been made on here with the fervour of a religious fanatic, every article or comment except the one or two that supported your belief. To be honest I see no difference between your stance and that of a religious person who is utterly convinced that his BELIEF is true. You have referred to adverse reactions and death caused by vaccines while ignoring the exceedingly low numbers and then ran with it like you had made a great discovery.
He seems to thrive on rejection.
Because I am on the right side of the issue, and you are not.
Every day there is more and more information coming to light
that vindicates and validates my position.
Please stand by for more information.
So not a 'top scientist' but a retired specialist in another discipline, and your report is in a crank website.
Where is his published statistical analysis? Without that, this report is worthless.
Badges? He don't need no stinking badges!
I take it you researched the articles I provided? I got that info from Zerohedge to > Epoch news. Some crap went down between Zerohedhmge & Google so the info was kind of hard to find. Big pharma wanted zerohedge punished for telling the truth about the jabs Google supposedly removed ads from zerohedge at big pharma request. But all these folks who got all the jabs will drop within the next year or so. From my understanding, death comes I 3 month waves to avoid suspicion of many deaths at once. What the eff do people think all the GMO experiments were for. I'd they can make resistant plants by modifying genes, can they not also make something harmful by modifying genes? It stands to reason yes. And it's not the 1st time biological /chemical weapons have been used. Humans are capable of all kinds of heinousness. Is it wrong force to say , "yes, the gene pool needs cleaning anyway?"
Jab up & genocide away sheeple.
So, as far as I can tell they have been able to do these vaccines in the way that every 3rd month there is going to be a wave of deaths from vaccines. That sounds very cleaver to me to be able to do it that way.
I take it you researched the articles I provided? I got that info from Zerohedge to > Epoch news. Some crap went down between Zerohedhmge & Google so the info was kind of hard to find. Big pharma wanted zerohedge punished for telling the truth about the jabs Google supposedly removed ads from zerohedge at big pharma request. But all these folks who got all the jabs will drop within the next year or so. From my understanding, death comes in 3 month waves to avoid suspicion of many deaths at once. What the eff do people think all the GMO experiments were for. If they can make resistant plants by modifying genes, can they not also make something harmful by modifying genes? It stands to reason yes. And it's not the 1st time biological /chemical weapons have been used. Humans are capable of all kinds of heinousness. Is it wrong for us to say , "yes, the gene pool needs cleaning anyway?"
Jab up & genocide away sheeple.
GMO’s are not beneficial In the scheme of use in the long run!!!
They rarely have long haul results that last long enough to make a significant difference in the long run of use!!!
@of-the-mountain ok, so what you're getting at is that they're highly unlikely to be gene targeted? Yeah, it's highly unlikely even with all the GMO products already out there on the market.
@Emme
When so called vaccines do not have a weaken virus within it is not a vaccine, it is genetic modification that our immune system can not use overall and it affects are lackluster for our immunity in the long run!!!
So much for 95% efficacy that can not last more than a few weeks if at all!!!
@of-the-mountain thanks. I'm on here after experiencing the side effects 1st hand and have questions and want to share info. I'm not here to convert or lead any sheeple to water. I'd just like to share and research and gather information in peace. I'm at a loss for why certain people don't just move on silently if they find something disagreeable or have nothing relevant to share.
Thank you again for sharing your opinion , it's genuinely appreciated.
'A number of conclusions can be drawn from the analyses reported above. The first is that by applying PRR methodology it is possible to use the passively reported Yellow Card data to detect and quantify safety signals for novel vaccines, to gain insights into particular sex and age classes that may be affected by particular adverse reactions, and to compare the safety profile of different vaccines. The second conclusion is that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines do not appear to be safe. Glaring safety signals are apparent indicating harm to the lymph system, the heart and to female reproduction. There can be no question that the mRNA vaccines should be withdrawn with immediate effect. The final conclusion is that the MHRA has provided no protection to the U.K. public from the adverse effects of the novel COVID-19 vaccines. Its regular publication “Coronavirus vaccine — summary of Yellow Card reporting” has been an exercise in defending the COVID-19 vaccines from criticism rather than defending the U.K. public from the COVID-19 vaccines. Its reports lack any scientific rigour, include not a single piece of statistical analysis to support the conclusions drawn, and are an affront to the huge number of individuals who have been injured or killed doing what they believed to be ‘the right thing’.