It is the areola that is the sin. The entire breast can be exposed with the exception of the areola. Same with the buttocks. The crack is the sin not the glutinous maximus. Go figure.

in New York its legal for a woman to be topless

Bob's Boobs besmerch breasts but Beatty's be beautiful.

Ever since college days I've been fond of Desmond Morris, writer of the Naked Ape. He propounds that breasts are a simulation of the rump when humans became bipedal. No other primate, not gorilla nor chimps, has anything near of the size of the human female. The reason: to reinforce the pair bond so the couple will stay together long enough to raise a baby, which is born helpless.

I think that there can be a problem if a woman goes topless and then has a fit if people look intentionally. That's a little silly. I've had no problem in being topless, scars and all since I had a breast reduction going from DD to B because they were uncomfortable.

I think women should be able to go topless like men do, its not fair I tell ya!

Haha.

For your edification: [en.wikipedia.org]

good one

I have heard someone is making a bikini top that covers the "unacceptable" female nipple and has silk screened on the outside, the "more acceptable" male nipple.

I'd like to see the look on the face of the bikini police encountering one of these.

Made me look.

Well defined and small please.

Seems Luke everyone is missing the points.THE NIPPLLES.They have to be covered because they are windows to the sole.Like a penis,which is OK flaccid but dare to get aroused and you are called a pervert.Women on a nudist beach may feel aroused and you can't tell.

When I was fit I had decent pecs, women liked it, now I have moobs, I think they get jealous.

Fort Collins Colorado allowed toplessness, but a judge put a hold on the ruling last year. Arguments are about to start in the 10th Court Of Appeals. This passed over a year ago, but I've not seen any news reports of any women going topless in public before the judge's hold. Ridiculous that we even have to have this conversation...but at least we're having one: [denver.cbslocal.com]

hehehehehehe. I love bOObs

Love breasts!

Love em!!!!

I don't think anyone posted this? There are gathering around New England every year on this day: [freethenipple.com]

I have not stop laughing yet !!!

There was an american boxer... middleweight I believe in the early 80's. He needed a bra. His nickname was the "vampire", due missing teeth but his breast put in shame many women I had seen. Sooner or later the announcer has to say something about his breasts... they were distracting... I wouldn't want to face him. You have to see the guy to understand. They were very perky nipples. I will try to find photo of him boxing.

If I was writing the law, everybody would be free to wear (or not) whatever they want and cover (or not) whatever parts of their body they desire. Not like I have any desire to walk down the street naked, yet I strongly believe that the clothing (or its absence) is strictly within the personal domain and as such no entity or institution has the right to enforce it outside of its own premises.

I'm glad you used the word "breasts". I dispise the word "boob", which to me, is an ignorant person. Part of the problem is not calling physical parts what they are......to infantilize them in a way. Grow up, folks. Don't be boobs!

From a purely letchy point of view if I'm in a position to access a pair of boobs I luv 'em

This is fantastic!!