'Complete Joke': Democrats Ripped for Totally Failing to Grill FCC Chair Ajit Pai Over Net Neutrality Cyberattack Lies
This is what Caitlin Johnstone is talking about in her 1-2 punch article. [caitlinjohnstone.com] Although she is in reality talking about all issues within our government, that article was actually written at the time this very issue, net neutrality, began to run course. So this time we are literally in hand to hand combat. Rather than the democrats holding a republican responsible for lying to the public, FBI, and to a congressional hearing, they skirt the act. But if this was a case where the republicans wanted to move an issue to the right, they'd be all over pressing charges and having a democrat removed from their position. With the on going attacks on independent journalism and factual news sources bringing light to government crimes and shenanigans, the democrats are more than willing to keep net neutrality moving to the right to continue to sweep their misdeeds uncovered. As Caitlin argues, they aren't fighting for us, they are also fighting against us. If we had a real Forth Estate, the Russian narrative wouldn't have made it past a week! We're going on 2 years now!?! It would have been about how the democrats and DNC stole the election in the primary of 2016, how Clinton managed to transfer state donations to her national campaign, pay to play, voter purging in strong Sanders supporter areas, uncounted votes, and all the shenanigans in the caucuses that went down. These are the issues that only few people understand, those that seek alternative news, due to the current so called Forth Estate and present net control today. Imagine how it will be if the democrats get away with their compliance to gain even more control over the internet. We might as well be living in China.
1
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
1 comment
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.With all youve said here I still can’t get past how any member of the Democratic Party was ok with how the Primary went down. Then all the other stuff but frankly, Im not even there yet because Im still flabbergasted over that. I understand they are a private organization and can make the rules how they want, but holy cow...regardless of your views, how do they still have members????
Christiep77
Level 7
Aug 18, 2018
0
That is the question of the election! And I would argue narrative is the culprit. Along with identity politics and heroism/idolism politics as a close second. Which really can all lead right back to narrative. With that said, how many of those people were willing to over look all the Clinton atrocities from the past to get, the first woman president elected? I have a list of them that did absolutely little good during the primary cycle. But as you put that, I ask the same for those that support the republicans. Who are infamous for voter purging in their own right. In which Greg Palast has been covering for several years. And how they do it. The question we all should be asking is why neither establishment party is combating the other over their tactics of purging qualified voters and the shenanigans used to deny us a legal election. We've known that the republicans, thanks to Greg Palast, use a list of similar names to purge voters. Yet the democratic party has never challenged this. And with all the attempts of the republicans to bring a Clinton down haven't batted an eye at that primary cycle. Which I would argue hands them a perfect opportunity to want a legitimate inquiry. I would also argue the reason neither wants to rock this boat would be that it would lead to calls for a better election process. Such as the one in Venezuela where they received very high standard reports from the international election community. Our election process is one that servers the oligarchy, it's not meant to serve us a fair election. This process guarantees the reelection of establishment politicians serving them which controls the amount of those who will attempt to initiate any type of real change.