Basically that's what it could lead to. I think the more important statement Caitlin is trying to make is that those of the left who have been towing the cow line that Trump is a puppet of Putin, they are now as much responsible for an arms race as the right is. While the shrills on the left have been trapped in the managed perception that Trump and the Russian government colluded to get Trump his victory, they either ignored or are ignorant to the information that Trump hasn't been so good to the Russians in many ways. We expelled many of their diplomats, if not all of them, from the country. We in a coalition effort bombed a airbase with Russian planes on it in Syria over a false chemical weapons claim, possibly killing some Russians, places sanctions on Russia, which keep expanding, allowed Israel to shoot down a plane of theirs killing more Russians, who's knows how many more are dead in battle with our terrorist funded groups, yet they have spent 2 years saying Trump isn't tough enough on the Russians. Oh yea. And we have moved missiles closer to the Russian border against set past treaties. I guess they want a full blown nuclear war!?! Go figure.

@William_Mary And of course Clinton would have been just as bad since she advocated moving more military and hardware to the Russian border to provoke a Putin attack. Pretty nerve wracking when the USA has mini nuclear missiles ready to launch seconds from Moscow. Only a matter of time before it best to strike first.

@rogerbenham some have argued even worse. She was strongly supporting a no fly zone over Syria. So, what, she wanted to shoot down Russian and Syrian planes defending a sovereign nation? Against what would be her terrorist groups. That could get ugly real fast!