Agnostic.com

4 3

Seems like the logical and prudent approach.
But then, I'm pretty conservative.
😉

bigpawbullets 9 Nov 30
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

4 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

All we are asking is that the government follow existing US and international law. If we spent the $200 million on processing the asylum requests instead of using tear gas on innocent civilians that are seeking to enter the US legally, then we might have a moral leg to stand on.

Bum-rushing the gate is not even CLOSE to trying to enter the US legally... Would you at least put some effort into an intelligent response?

And yes l agree with you on following US law though,, so build the damn wall already..

1

if we care more about americans, why are there so many homeless people. we can't say "america first" and then ignore americans that need help. most of these people are seeking asylum and the administration is using fear to manipulate the truth. seeking asylum is LEGAL

2

Haha, he mentioned the C word (conservative). That's by and large a curse word on this site...

@Veteran229 Go for it.

@Veteran229 Eh, might be, we know how the other side is prone to shutting us out...

2

Something's wrong if we can't figure out how to help out some desperate people fleeing from violent thugs for their lives. It doesn't say that you let everyone in or you you have to grant permanent residency, just a little common sense and compassion.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:234475
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.