Can't argue with the facts...
[cagw.org]
A guy probably wrote this...
I want to say that it's possibly a fact that men who bash women's looks have small d××ks!
They probably drive oversized trucks with monster tires to try to compensate for their lack of 'manhood'.
I've yet to be proven wrong.
I'm guessing you didn't read it.. has nothing to do with her looks. I personally think she's a very attractive lady, but that's not important. lt's about her pork barrel spending habits.
@Captain_Feelgood Donald Trump and his entourage are the biggest "porkers" that are costing taxpayers a sh×tload of money.
@SleeplessInTexas Even if that's true,, what was with the whole 'men that bash women's looks' thing? This isn't a left verses right thing, this website calls out conservatives as well for wasteful spending..
@Captain_Feelgood They got a man's opinion on this. Notice they put more female candidates than men. Yet who's running and has ran our country? This article is bullshit.
@Captain_Feelgood I stand by what I said. It's fact... so far.
This is from something called "Citizens Against Government Waste", an advocacy group that decided to declare Kamala Harris as "Porker of the Year". CAGW is right-wing 501c3 non-profit that has campaigned on behalf of the tobacco industry and has deep ties to the Koch brothers and the national right-wing network of funders, the so-called State Policy Network (SPN).
So, yes you can "argue with the facts" when they're not facts, just more right-wing BS.
Oh trust me,, they call out conservatives as well.
thank you, someone had to reveal the "facts".
What did this report that was not true?
The bashing of any female possible presidential candidate has begun!
Being female obviously has nothing to do with it, it's only about spending habits... lf you read it, or anything they report on for that matter, you would have gotten that..