Making Your Best Use Of The BLOCK Function
This is a large, diverse, and multi-purpose online community. It is both a privilage and a pleasure to use this site. The BLOCK function is merely a control, which enables you to customize your online community to keep yours and other's online experiences, positive, pleasant, and constructive.
At times, you will notice that there are people here who's perspective, life situation, needs, interests, or views may be so different from yours that there is really no strong rational reason for you to interact with them in any way. In that case: Block them forever.
Try not to ever block in anger. When you notice an issue with someone, read their profile, read their recent posts and comments, and if you see substantial conflict or even just unneccessary unpleasantness: Block them forever.
Don't use blocking to punish or taunt someone. Don't threaten anyone or talk to others about it. Be clean about it. Just block forever and live in peace.
If you go through a lot of changes in 10 or 20 years, you might revisit your block list and remove some of them. Otherwise, just leave it alone. Live in peace.
Enjoy your community.
I think everyone should use (or not use) the 'block' function as they see fit.
It doesn't matter why anyone would block anyone else. That's their business.
I know I've been blocked by others. I honestly don't care.
Everyone is free to block whomever they please, for whatever reasons they please.
There you go thinking again, prepair to be blocked!
I think you a rock star. I love your comments.
@Heathenman Thank you.
@KKGator Looks like you got a stalker, Gator. Block him!
@JacobMeyers LOL As if! LOL
I will never block anyone no matter what, because I value the diversity in perspective and enjoy engagement with people of different view points. By blocking someone with different ideas from you, you lock yourself into a box where you can not learn.
Even if they are being deliberately hateful, I will not block them because they still likely have something important to say, they just can not elaborate eloquently. Anger and rage is the last resort of a loser in debate, when they realize they are wrong and have to resort to violence.
There are really only 3 outcomes from civil discussion.
The two will decide they agree, maybe with some minor changes to one or the others perspective
They disagree but one changes their perspective once confronted with the evidence
They disagree and have reasons why. Although their opinions are not changed, they do more research until they have a more accurate perspective on reality.
I don't understand why people want to stay in their own tribal bubbles, and never experience the plethora of ideas that are out there. You can not progress unless you disrupt the status quo.
Well put ...so much so I’ve nothing to add above
You are wrong. I’ve met plenty of people online and in real life who have nothing useful to contribute. Also there ARE those that will be a net negative for you if you allow them in your life. Thinking otherwise is the opposite of misanthropic ( I can't think of what that would be atm). Surely it makes more sense that there is a spectrum of personalities out there where most are average but some will be on the extremes. There’s gonna be a few peeps who make your life much better and a few who make it much worse. What’s wrong with identifying the ones that are going to cause extreme harm to your existence and excising them?
@JacobMeyers if you don't think someone has something important to say you probably are not listening to them. Sometimes this requires "reading between the lines" and not just hearing what they say but also what they don't say. Engaging with dumb or ignorant people is important because they have the most to learn. Engaging with inteligent people is important because they have the most to teach.
Even engaging with people our society would label as toxic, rude, or opinionated is important, because without them you can not practice and eventually master social interaction and emotional intelligence. By learning how to work with them you gain skills applicable to all people.
There are no monsters if you are determined to make people's lives better.
@Happy_Killbot you make some decent points. I understand them but do not fully agree. I’m sure we will have to Agree to disagree. That last sentence tells the reason why. I am under no obligation to make people’s lives better. That’s their job. I’m happy to help if they are being respectful and genuinely appreciative. I’m no doormat, I won’t keep engaging someone who is being combative and abusive because they might miraculously teach me something about life. Imo that’s like searching through piles of shit hoping to find a diamond. It COULD happen. It’s more than likely you’ll end up with a few pennies and a lifetime of shitty hands.
FWIW I’m arguing in the extremes but don’t necessarily live my life that way. There’s more than a few asses in my life that I tolerate. A few specifically for the reasons you espouse. I am misanthropic out of pragmatism though. I truly believe in the spectrum of humanity and I’ve no doubt that there must surely be useless people as well as superbly noble people that have all the best traits of humanity. After this I might temper my inclination to walk away from mildly annoying individuals but the shit stains of the world are going to remain persona non grata. Thanks for your thoughts.
I have never blocked anyone on this site. I disagree with the political positions of many people here, but I have found I have a lot in common with them on issues outside of politics.
What bothers me is the site is too compartmentalized. Many people just want to have their own views reinforced. Conservatives post things on "Conservative Atheists", with a header like "This will make the Liberals Heads explode", then they won't post it in the Politics section.
If you don't have your views challenged, and you are not forced to reexamine them, you will never grow.
Too many folks want to live only in echo chambers.
I’ve never seen the need to block anyone. My thumb does just fine scrolling past text I don’t care to read.
I have no problem with anyone disagreeing with my opinion; if they find it necessary to denigrate my opinion or me by name calling or trying to tell me what I am as in a personal attack after I have asked them to stop and that it is not the way to promote good conversation I will block them. In the time I have been a member of agnostic.com I have had to block only one (1) person.
I'm curious if anyone has me blocked. If you've blocked me, just let me know here.
Wait...
Anyone who's blocked you , won't see this message ,
@Cast1es That was my point.
@Sgt_Spanky Some day when I finish programming my sarcasm font I’ll be rich.
I've never blocked anyone. There are a few people here whose views irk me, but to block because I'm annoyed by an opposing view seems immature to me (just for myself, not judging other people's motivations for blocking). The closest I've come to blocking anyone has been when I felt harassed — in the forum or in messenger. I've refrained so far, but I'm glad the option exists if I feel it becomes necessary. I know one person in particular has blocked me, but I don't know why; it's someone I often agreed with and I don't recall ever having a dispute with. <shrug>
I never block anyone, however odious their views or hateful their tone. Everyone has the right to a voice.
I would only block someone if they threatened me or my family in any way.
Everyone has the right to a voice, but not the right to be heard.
Nope gotta disagree. Some people loose their right to a voice by abusing it. Maybe we are all born with it but that doesn’t mean you get it forever.
I blocked just a few minutes ago when a heated discussion went amok... we were both making our points when apparently he could not think of a response, so he made the "you have 2 sets of lips, I have 2 heads" comment iinstead.....bu-bye!
Note: I worked in a shipyard 13 years amongst 20,000 men, many of whom had "liquid lunches" and didn't have to hear that on here!
We may have 2 heads but show me a man that has enough blood in his body to make both work at the same time.
What a tiny mind to think a comment like that is in any way cogent to any type of rational discourse. I kinda wish I could borrow your block list
There is another function a bit more powerful than the block function. It does have a long name, therefore is not as easy to use. It's called "Move on when it's time, turn the page and let it go. Do not let anyone take control of how I react to anything." Or the short version, which it has already mentioned, it's called "Ignore". It really works.
@Matias also for some of us (me at least) I read the content before I ever look at the name of the poster. When someone consistently posts shit I end up having to smell it over and over so they get a block.
I’m sure you are well meaning, but do you really think we need a lesson in how to go about managing the functions on the site? I don’t think a tutorial on the desirability of using the Block function is either necessary or wise. I find that I am perfectly able to either respond or ignore irritating or aggressive posts or replies without having to resort to the “nuclear” option of blocking. It seems rather counterintuitive to being a critical thinker.
lol I'm with you Marion. If we were right wing 'Trumpets" we'd probably need step by step instructions
Blocking on this site isn't 'clean'. If you host or mod groups and don't duplicate your personal blocks with group blocks you'll see them again there.
And yes people block you and stay in groups you created - 'surprise!'.
And when you reach Level 7 you join a group called "Senate" where there are no blocks.
Develop a thick skin if you plan on staying - some turd will make it a point to yell in your face and call it "free speech".
I wish blocks here worked like they do on FB. When you block? They're gone for good with no surprise bleed through.
I really don't even need to know they've been visiting the same posts I have? It just makes me want to leave those places too.
Some of these idgits reach stalker levels.
And yet other folks make staying worthwhile.
"And when you reach Level 7 you join a group called "Senate" where there are no blocks."
huh? i've blocked several ppl since i've been level 7.
@callmedubious Senate Group does not have personal blocks.
I was literally railroaded out of Senate by a group of bullies. In a concerted effort.
It's way more peaceful here in general population!
Except when blocks fail as they sometimes do. (Site glitches or learning experiences IDK).
Let me know if you ever see a member stand up for another in there. I'd be happy to hear the battle continues. (And btw a very few did). I should mention that. I count those my dearest friends.
I do not agree, as you say. "there are people here who's perspective, life situation, needs, interests, or views may be so different from yours that there is really no strong rational reason for you to interact with them in any way." But they are the people who I most want to learn about, and to learn about them is why I use social media. I can see that we may need blocks if people are really offensive or threatening such as stalkers, but I have not had to use the block so far.
i've blocked a bunch. the latest was a self-righteous jerk who said i was contributing to gun violence b/c i like to target practice with my olympic style handgun a few times/yr.
@callmedubious Yes I would block him if he became threatening, but do not forget that people like that need exposure to good open debate more than anything, and that sealing them off fulfills the wish they have to see themselves as outside mainstream society.
@Fernapple ,
"outside mainstream society."?
he was so inside that he was a caricature off mainstream society.
I don't block anyone for disagreeing with me, but if they can't do so respectfully, they are blocked. If they post loads of garbage (Youtube links and the like) they are blocked. If they display attitudes and values which are obnoxious to me (think gun-worshippers, or Trumpists for example) they are blocked. It's just like turning off your phone - not a big deal; block away.
I’ve never blocked anyone. I figure that being insulted builds character if you learn to let the jab roll off like water off a duck’s back. Having an ego response just perpetuates the quarrel.
It’s true that some people post a lot of things that don’t interest me, but if I were to block them I’d miss out if they did post something of interest.
Is there any way to find out who has blocked you? I don’t know what I’d do with the information—it’s just a perverse desire.
Thank you William. I frequently suggest that even a broken analog clock tells the correct time twice a day. Some clocks however take so long in arriving at a correct "time" that the seconds are too aggravating to endure!
@FrayedBear a stopped analog clock is accurate 2 minutes out of 1,440 per day, or 0.13888889% of the time. So there's the number to attach to your frustration.
@1of5 lol, but if that 0.13888889% saves your life I think that the wait may be worth it. However if the 99.861% drives you to madness or fatal error of judgement it is not worth it.
@1of5 And to be pedanticit is only correct for one minute if it does not have a second hand. If it does it is only correct for one second everytwelve hours!
@FrayedBear some people are digital clocks, just fucking broken 24/7.
@JacobMeyers Lmao - as many know - I'm a wind up kind of guy.
@FrayedBear the 99% already drives me nuts.
I was gonna do it in seconds but figured if something is only right for a second it's not worth considering, as once the contemplation is concluded it'll be wrong again. Might as well just drink at that point.
As an experiment I unblocked everyone on New Year's day. There was one member that was reblocked within a couple of months. IMHO, life is just to short to try to deal with other people's issues when they are not making any attempt. This person seemed to enjoy needling and nit picking. Nope. As I am a mod/group owner, if I block personally I block in my groups as well. Owners/mods have to be able see what is posted in our groups. Next new years day I will likely repeat the experiment with the exception of that one person. What was really interesting of the 4 or 5 that I had blocked, several had dropped off the site. Such is the transient nature of social medial type sites.
I don't mind blocking if someone is rude or ignorant but I think it is very important to have our thoughts and ideas challenged. WE should be open to having our mind changed and this is a really difficult thing to do. Mostly humans are are stubborn when we make up our mind. And remember science is expected to replicated itself but sometimes it gets it wrong and previous findings are updated. Be humble and listen to different opinions.
A caveat to blocking may be you will create an echo chamber of like mindedness.
Depends on the reason for the block I think. If I block someone because they are either unencumbered by intelligence or combative to the point they consistently resort to ad hominem, then at least the echo chamber will be filled with thoughts and ideas instead of personal (and ultimately useless) insults. I can live with that
@JacobMeyers spot on.