Agnostic.com

13 10

Didn't Israel already kill the hostages?

Israel rejects ceasefire unless hostages freed after Blinken meeting.

[bbc.com]

The death toll of 1400 Israelies vs 9000 and counting Palestinians is so horrific. Returning the hostages will NOT bring back any of the dead. And it will NOT stop Israel from killing more Palestinians. So why would the hostages be returned? Assuming any of them are still alive. My guess is Israeli bombing has already killed them either directly or by the collective punishment principle that Israel has implemented.

Shaggy2018 7 Nov 3
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

13 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Can we just agree that Palestine under British colonialism was forced to dissolve their empire to receive USA support in WW2, that Palestine was to be divided into 2 countries which the Arabs rejected & Israel accepted. The area has been a point of contention historically. The Islamic terrorists refuse to accept that the Judaic people have as much of a claim as do the Moslems. What I know is that Hamas holds no elections as that is far more difficult than attacking Jews. What I know is that under Jordan's king Jews were denied access to their holy sites. Under Israel's control Jerusalem is open to all religions. What I know is that Arabs vote in Israel but in almost none of the Arab countries. Need I mention the issues with women & Islam? Gaznians are hostage to the terrorists & are suffering the consequences. The Palestinian Authority was destroyed by Hamas & Gaznians have no say in what Hamas chooses to do. What Israel is doing currently is abhorant. It is all abhorant. Hamas is the same as all of the other vile lunatics who think that 70 virgins await them. Remeber 9/11 was not a Judaic attack. It was an Islamic extremist attack. Until Islam accepts a 2 state solution we are hostages to history. [msn.com]

0
6

Interesting how Israel is consider the good guys with their strong military (supported by other countries I suspect in atonement for their treatment under the Nazis (80 years ago). They have been given a share of another's country and have continued to treat the indigenous as so many others have treated their indigenous people's when taking over their country. The Palestinians have had many of their rights taken away along with resources needed to live. Of course they can absolutely not have their own military (could be why Israel is against the two state solution) so what can they do to keep from being slowly erased from what once was their country!? Seems to me often 'terrorist' groups succeed and then go on to becoming a valid state with their own military (look at our own history). The attempt by the Israel 'leadership', and I use the word loosely, to brand any anti-Zionist as also being anti-semitic is a ploy to keep any criticism of the country at bay.

Interesting how with only minor changes make the same post can be read about the American's treatment of the indigenous people that they too forced in to crappy bits of land no one wanted until oil was found there, at which point they to were pushed aside as heathen savages.

@LenHazell53 And all their attempts to fight back only got them branded as terrorists.

@FrayedBear I agree totally. Funny, but some time ago there was a report on one of the most sought after degree in the US and the answer was anthropology. More and more corporations are hiring anthropologists in order to get an idea of how humans work and think. Perhaps it's time for politicians to get the message.

@jackjr so long as aforesaid corporations are wanting the knowledge to not repeat the mistakes of the past but find replacement intelligent solutions that benefit everyone not just the shareholders & employees of that corporation.

@FrayedBear Agree except the job of a CEO is to please the shareholders. If they care about the environment, the poor, etc then their company will. I have worked with many executives and owners. In general Shareholders live in a different world and don't give a shit about anyone but themselves. And their money keeps them isolated, not just because of what they directly pay for, but because people are reluctant to criticize them - they have power. For example, I often work directly with the owner of my company (not publicly traded) and I would never say anything critical to her. I have a family and couldn't loose my job. It's all rigged.

@towkneed Although I understand that your behaviour may be driven by fear you are not being true to yourself nor the shareholder.

Do you or many like being lied to? IMO your pretense is the same as lying. To me what makes it worse is that you are also effectively lying to yourself. Until you stop you cannot learn how to improve yourself & grow.

Oh, & in my opinion also CEOs who are working share prices are most likely not complying with regulatory procedures nor maximising their efforts to ethically & legally maximise the profitability of the company.

@FrayedBear No offense, but my family comes first to me. Before truth, or justice or the rest of the world. And you don't really know me at all. Of course I don't know you either so I won't criticize you, except to say that your usage of "pretense" is based on several assumptions which, I feel, have no basis except maybe in your internal dialectics and the emotions they produce. I can understand your response but I fail to see what it actually has to do with my post. And please understand, I'm not asking for an explanation - your reply may be due to me not being clear. Clarity, after all, is based so much on a shared understanding of foundational motions.

@towkneed no offense taken. Do I understand that you work for your family company?

Returning to your initial comment on CEO roles. Yes there is a direct link between shareholder & CEO however it is actually the board of directors who employ him\her. Any shareholder would be irate if the CEO through the board of directors failed to identify opportunities for increased company profitability that are moral, legal & benefitting all of humanity. When such are not benefitting all they are detrimental to the company & its shareholders who strangely are human beings.

Do you think Palestinian investors are putting their money in the US companies that are making the armaments & bombs blowing them up? I suggest that what you are involved in will eventually be used against you & your children. . . No man is an island.

I'm reminded of the image of the Swiss investor here in Australia who before bed each night spread his multimillion dollars woth of share certificates on top of his bed to drool over. By day he worked for a printing company. At night he lived alone with his share certificates. What a life.

4

Hamas started the war and needs to be destroyed. I don’t have any sympathy for Hamas or the Palestinians who allow Hamas to carry out attacks on Israel.

The war was started when the Jewish people were given another country to share. There have been battles (mostly because of the harsh treatment by Israel toward the Palestinians) with periods on standstill. This war has been ongoing since 1947 and will not change until a more viable solution is found.

@jackjr There will have to be regime change in Iran for us to have relative peace in the Middle East.

@Trajan61 Look how well that went in Iraq. Who are we to make that determination? Iran is still salty about Mosaddegh in 1953.

Palestinians ALLOWED Hamas??? The Palestinians don't control Hamas, and they are terrorized by Hamas also- they want to live in peace and Hamas doesn't allow that.

@JonnaBononna The Palestinians elected Hamas to run their government in 2007.

@JonnaBononna, @Scott321 We don’t have to send troops. Just support the opposition. There’s plenty as the radical Islamic regime in Iran killed a woman just because she didn’t have her head scarf on right.

@Trajan61 The reason people have the leaders they have is because their country already has serious political problems (like the U.S. at the present time. Iran was still carrying a grudge for us removing their Shah in 1953 and replacing him with a puppet. The puppet was heavy handed and people were still angry. Khomeini took advantage of the situation and get his henchmen to stir up problems. Turned out things were worse under their new 'supreme' leader. Any regime change in Iran will have to follow another bloody revolution. I know about the details as I was married to an Iranian woman and she was not afraid of speaking out.

@Trajan61, @JonnaBononna I doubt the Palestinian lifestyle is not very peaceful. At any moment one could have their home taken away or experience some other degrading event.

@jackjr Maybe if we’d support the political opposition in Iran the oppressed people of Iran could get rid of the radical Islamic rulers.

@Trajan61 And how has that worked out. Now they again have the same old criminal they had before. Besides, a posting I made previously from a group, the Overpopulation Project, clearly showed the real problem; two groups with different religions and cultures being forced to share a small space. All the hype and pointing fingers is just a wast of time and effort.

So why did your country murder 100's of thousands in revenge for a few American deaths in 9\11? Did you murder the right people? "So you think that Israel is committing war crimes killing Palestinians in Gaza in revenge for the ..."

@FrayedBear The biggest mistake we made was not killing more of the Taliban.

@Trajan61 [slate.com]

@Trajan61

Many Iranians women today are burning their headdress like western women in the 70s burning their bras. They are strongly putting their lives dangerous on the line, and no worst warth than from a women. She will use the men children to protect herself.

2

I wonder if anyone has read THE PROTOCOLS OF ZION ? Published in 1903.
It is has been very controversial since it's appearance, doubts of it's authenticity still continue to this day. What I find so interesting is that this work is eerily close to historical fact, before it came about.
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is frightening, disturbing perhaps enlightening too. But to anyone who actually reads it, the implications in this book has a remarkable bearing to the Israel-Gaza conflict.
How is it that a book so old can be so modern, whether it be truth or fiction??

Thank you. This situation is a ot more complicated than many, simpleminded, people would have.

There are better sources to inform oneself about the Palestinian-Israeli conflict than a concocted antisemitic fever dream.

The Protocols are fake in so far as they are about a Zionist plot to take over the world.
However in terms of it being guide book on how to politically dominate a democracy and turn it in to a totalitarian state, it is has been the blue print for every one who has ever done it or tried to do it.
It is not what it claims to be, but it is what it is, as a work of political doctrine.

@LenHazell53 That is the point I tried to make. Whether authentic or fake, the point is that it is a blueprint for today's conflict giving a historical background and justification for the atrocities by Israel.
I surprised by the comments so far, how many can comment on a book they have not actually physically read.

@vocaloldfart I have read it, it is fucking terrifying when you realise how Goebbels used it both as a master plan and as propaganda against his targets

Trumps 1st law: Always accuse you opponents of having done the atrocities you are currently committing.

@LenHazell53 application of psychological projection to protect the mind of the guilty from its crimes. Seems to me because of it USA cannot see its own crimes against humanity.

@LenHazell53 I have had the book for 50 years. I originally bought it to find out who really runs the world. Who or what has the long term agenda, who profits and why.
I have found viable links to Rothschild et al Bankers Inc ,following the money trail but no actual concrete proof.
It is still a work in progress, as there are so many diverging paths and avenues.
I have come to the conclusion that no matter of the outcome of this conflict, the where and wherefores and whys, the only ones to gain benefit are the bankers in the dark background financing and profiting.
Perhaps the Protocols of Zion was satirical a novel written to send a message to the Banker families?

0

"Didn't Israel already kill the hostages?" - that's if it wasn't a joint Mossad CIA operation in the first place & they weren't taken back into Gaza.

That's a ridiculous notion, but totally in line with other nonsense from the same source (a tattered Russian bear).

@Flyingsaucesir just like the 9\11 destruction of the twin towers in NY is also attributed to the CIA and Mossad:
[rochester.indymedia.org]

But do also read the following:

[theburningplatform.com]

[express.co.uk]

"Israel created Hamas, in the same way punching someone in the same place repeatedly creates a ..."

@Flyingsaucesir and while you're at your scoffing watch this from Rumble:

[rumble.com]

Do you also want to revisit JFK's murder after watching the video or just too chicken shit scared to confront reality?

@FrayedBear That's quite a rabbit hole you got there Bugs 🐰😂😂😂

It's likely a few hostage are killed , the tunnel system has been prepared very deep. The hostage are being treated much better than the Gazan children above.

3

Has Hamas issued demands or requests to free the hostages? They had threatened to kill them if Israel didn't warn residents before directing attacks and that has probably happened. So has Hamas killed them? Has Israel killed them as collateral damage? Probably. Hamas did ask for a swap with Israeli prisoners, but the last time, it was 2000 prisoners for one hostage, and those ex-prisoners are almost certainly among the Hamas members Israel seeks to kill.

Per Reuters: "More than half the estimated 220 hostages held by Palestinian group Hamas have foreign passports from 25 different countries, including 54 Thai nationals, the Israeli government said on Wednesday." Per CBS, more that 20 are under 18 and more than 10 are over 80. At least 9 are Americans per Axios.

Per Doctors Without Borders: "International humanitarian law prohibits taking and executing hostages. Such acts are considered war crimes (GCI–IV Common Art. 3; GCIV Arts. 34, 147; API Art. 75) and can be tried before any national court, under the principle of universal jurisdiction. This is possible as long as the State in question has incorporated this obligation (derived from the Geneva Conventions) into its domestic laws."

That last part may or may not apply to Hamas if they haven't signed onto the Geneva Conventions.

Also: "•Rule 113 states that “Each party to the conflict must take all possible measures to prevent the dead from being despoiled. Mutilation of dead bodies is prohibited.” This rule is applicable in both international and non-international armed conflicts."

0

I regret to say, that you are most likely right, that most of the hostages have been killed already by the Israeli bombing, with the only exceptions being those that were held underground in the tunnel systems under Gaza.

Many of the tunnels have been destroyed at this point. Pretty much all of Gaza is destroyed.

@MyTVC15 Well, if that is the case, then the hostages probably are about all dead, you would think. I honestly haven't been keeping up on all the news about it, mainly to preserve and protect my mental health. I don't need increased depression..

4

How would anyone know at this point if all hostages are accounted for ? alive or dead. Everything is a pile of rubble.

There are still 240 hostages but some say the number is much higher.

2

Interesting... I don't remember any videos of Israel taking any hostages. Or instigating Hamas's massacre/rape of innocent teenagers at a music festival for that matter.

No proof of hamas raped or babies killed. Western propergada to create a genocide.

3

I think israel is ready to sacrifice the Israeli hostages to the cause of obliterating Hamas, just as Hamas is ready to sacrifice Palestinian civilians to the cause of obliterating Israel.

Rule number one: Don't negotiate with terrorists.

I think that there are some in the Israeli leadership (Netanyahu) that do not mind sacrificing the hostages, but I think there is a large part of the population of Israel that are as horrified by the way their government is going about this as we are.

@MyTVC15 Like all strong men/autocrats, Netanyahu wants to appear tough. That's more important to him than a few civilian lives.

@Flyingsaucesir I'm watching Chris Hayes right now and he is talking about the other extreme right people in the Israeli government. It seems to me that they are in the process of commiting genocide in Gaza and pogroms in the West Bank. It seems to me that they are doing to the Palestinians what was done to them in the Holocaust. I am sickened by it.

@MyTVC15 Chris Hayes is a credible source.

@captfeelgood One man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter. I can find no justification for Hamas's actions on October 7. But however heinous and inhumane they were, they were also somewhat predictable. I mean, they did not come out of a clear blue sky, without provocation. No. For 75 years Israelis (Zionists) have pushed Palestinian Arabs off their land, building instead their own exclusively Jewish settlements. This continued expansion of Jewish settlements in the West Bank and Gaza has been deemed illegal by the United Nations. But Israel heeds no one; not even its greatest ally, the USA, who has urged Israel to cease settlement construction on disputed land. The weaker party in the dispute cannot possibly fight back conventionally, so they resort to asymmetric warfare. The problem with terms like "terrorists" in a situation like this one is that they tend to obscure the history, the wider context in which the conflict takes place. Sure, the acts of Hamas on 10/7 were atrocious, but so is 75 years of pushing a poor minority off their land, boxing them in, creating an apartheid system. And, to some extent, even this is understandable, given the rhetoric coming from that poor minority, calling for the total annihilation of Israel. To unravel this mess, we have to go all the way back to the beginning, in 1948, when sharp-elbowed Zionists started killing Arab livestock, burning Arab crops, emptying out Arab towns and villages. There was an original sin, and it should be clear by now that it will not be forgotten.

@captfeelgood So why has America been supporting Israel with money and arms since 1948. Ben Gurion the first Prime Minister of Israel was a terrorist? Israeli terrorism against American soldiers occurred in the 1950s in Egypt.

@captfeelgood

I thought awat team are 94% hostage negotiator are successful. Not with Israel system of hundreds died for one hamas soldier.

0

I love your optimism 😐

4

Israel is on a biblical mission. The way they are going, they may have a biblical ending. The IDF did not care for hostages not taken to Gaza, nor the thousands of Palestinians they have locked up without due process.
Collective punishment is a war crime so I doubt hostages count for much to them.

puff Level 8 Nov 3, 2023

@FrayedBear No one read this crap the first 30 times you posted it, so find something new.

@glennlab you mean Americans in denial refuse to confront their neurosis. Those who aren't in denial & have the intestinal fortitude to do so comment intelligently & give a 👍 or👌.

@glennlab have you watched this video of Canadian professor emeritus at Ottowa university talking on the subject?
[en.wikipedia.org]

[rumble.com]
An interesting video primarily on the fact that Hamas is funded & was created by Israel but also containing interesting information on the 1960's USA attempt to murder its own citizens & blame it on Cuba.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:736163
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.