Have you read the following article which identifies a reduction in detected crime around the world

[worldpopulationreview.com]

I do not disagree with you that the inhumane incidents reported by you are wrong.

@FrayedBear I've scanned through it. The operative word is 'reported'. In the UK many crimes are not even reported to the police because it is known that they won't bother to investigate it. I once tried to report a case of criminal damage, to be told that it was a civil matter, and not of concern to the police. Having been a former police officer, I quoted the relevant Act, but the operator refused to accept it. It was a similar case when I tried to report a theft.

Official police figures in the UK do not reflect the true crime level, and clear up rates for crimes are terrible. In many cases, the police cannot give accurate figures because some crimes can be recorded in a number of different ways, and it is for the individual policeman to decide which category a crime should be recorded under

Looking at some of the countries, coercion and bribery operates routinely in many of the highest scoring countries and corrupt judges can be bought.

The British police forces weren't happy when one government drastically cut their budgets, saying that the 'drop' in crime meant that fewer officers were needed. It was hard for the police forces to respond to that, after all they could hardly admit to fiddling the figures; something that could see the pepetrator losing their job, and possibly their liberty.

@Magister tell me about it! I've just had rachmanism from my landlord, a church organisation, send me into lockdown since last September. Legal advise told me that the police treat it as a civil matter. They couldn't have done more damage if they had hit me with an ironbar.

An enqury into the law has seen me make several submissions. The last stated that revealing criminal wrong doing would result in prosecution of the perpetrator . All I've had is silence since December.

4 years ago police, complainant & main witness perjury resulted in a magistrate making orders against me. The female complainant 18 months later made further statement identifying that everything that I had said was true.
I was then found to be in contempt of court for having publicly revealed the truth. The perjurors were never prosecuted.

@FrayedBear I've sat in court cases, where the most bizarre of judgments were made. In one case, a man admitted assault, the jury was shown video footage of the assault, the police gave evidence after arriving on the scene in minutes, and three eye-witnesses gave evidence.

The judge had the court cleared, annnounced that he didn't regard the witnesses were credible - I suspect that he either didn't like the look of them, or maybe they had criminal records - the jury were called back and directed to find the man not guilty. This was despite the admission and other evidence.

That was only one of many. It became obvious that the judicial system was a complete farce. Getting justice was as likely as getting the police to investigate a crime. They seem to pick and choose what they will investigate.
If only people knew.

Do they give a brass razoo?

@FrayedBear hell no

@FrayedBear I had to look that one up

@William_Mary 100 yo. Australian. Lol. Rarely heard now.