Russiagate Implodes, Pleasing Trump But Leaving the Left in the Cold

[blackagendareport.com]

(The fate of empire could not be left in Donald Trump’s erratic little hands, so he was to be hobbled by Russiagate from day one of his presidency. The main objective, however, was not to knock Trump off -- which was always a dangerous long shot -- but to control him, and to keep the war hysteria going.)

I still just don't buy into that narrative. To me it's obvious the Clinton campaign was out to make sure what happened in 2008 didn't happen in 2016. Martin O'Malley, fairly safe to say he wasn't going to make it, dropped out before the primary election. And the only formidable candidate they were willing to put up was Sanders. I use the word formidable very lightly. Obviously it was meant to be Clinton's time. And allowing a proclaimed socialist stand aside of her was very acceptable, so they thought. To them it would be a dog and pony show, made with attack agreements before hand, that Clinton could cake walk from. We later found out mid primary of that agreement. But they, from being so out of touch with society, didn't fathom the amount of support a socialist would pull in. But grassroots efforts on social media took off with Sanders and people from all parties jumped on board. That created a fucking nightmare for the Clinton campaign. 2008 all over again.

But Trump has played well within the same game plan as the establishment from the beginning. I refuse to be fooled into believing he hasn't. And that they would be quite happy with another 4 years with him. I look at Trump's little narrative war with our intelligence agencies the same way as with the MSM. It's all show. While he got 5 billion in free air time during the election cycle, he's still chalking up free time while some really important issues are being ignored. Bet your ass that is by design.

(The FBI has never attempted to question Wikileaks founder Julian Assange about the nature of the delivery, even though Assange is easy to find, locked up in the Ecuadorean embassy in London. Neither have they attempted to speak with Craig Murray, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan who claims to have accepted the hand-delivery of data on the campus of American University, in Washington, DC. The reason the FBI has avoided talking to the most important witnesses in the case, and that they never inspected the DNC server, is obvious: they know that the whole Russiagate story is bogus.

Any valid investigation would begin with the two most important witnesses, Assange and Murray. There was no investigation, and there will be no judicial resolution of Russiagate because any such proceedings in a court of law would be a disaster for the State. Instead, Russia and Wikileaks were framed in a media show trial.)

Right now it still seems the establishment and MSM are going to continue to draw this out, possibly right up to the 2020 elections. They are essentially, silently, admitting to hand Trump another 4 years. Here's another thought for you. The truth to 2016 hasn't been let out yet. And the truth is still out there. As within the article, there are 2 essential people to the truth who have been ignored during the investigation, Assange and Murray. And I'll add Seth Rich. Was Rich the one who handed Murray the thumbs drive in DC? Where Rich was murdered shortly after. What has Assange done with that drive?