The ‘Guccifer 2.0’ Gaps in Mueller’s Full Report

Like Team Mueller’s indictment last July of Russian agents, the full report reveals questions about Wikileaks’ role that much of the media has been ignoring, writes Daniel Lazare.

[consortiumnews.com]

Well this article goes into some of what I brought up yesterday. BUT....

(Indeed, when Mueller charged 13 employees and three companies owned by Russian businessman Yevgeny Prigozhin with interfering in the 2016 election, he clearly didn’t expect them to surrender either. Thus, his team seemed taken aback when one of the alleged “troll farms” showed up in Washington asking to be heard. The prosecution’s initial response, as McCarthy put it, was to seek a delay “on the astonishing ground that the defendant has not been properly served – notwithstanding that the defendant has shown up in court and asked to be arraigned.” When that didn’t work, prosecutors tried to limit Concord’s access to some 3.2 million pieces of evidence on the grounds that the documents are too “sensitive” for Russian eyes to see. If they are again unsuccessful, they may have no choice but to drop the charges entirely, resulting in yet another “public relations disaster” for the Russia-gate investigation.)

....this is what I've brought up a few times before. In other words. Mueller got his ass handed to him. Rather than releasing supposed evidence for opposition lawyers to view to defend their clients, Mueller goes into delay mode, then nothing goes forward with a prosecution. There is no fucking evidence! There's only approximately 100k in money spent on social media adds and post which were viewed by such little amount of people it amounts to an ant on a fucking mountain. Which I'll bet my pay check this week, wasn't in the god dam evidence. Or he'd be laughed out of the court.