Impeachment hearings--What to take from it---What you're not getting from it---Where do they want to take you?

Ukraine For Dummies---There was no excuse for Congress’ ignorance of Ukraine. Here is a guide to help.

[consortiumnews.com]

{The date that NATO, Western diplomats, and the corporate media have chosen – disingenuously – as the beginning of recent European history, with silence about the coup orchestrated in Kyiv the day before. President Vladimir Putin returns to Moscow from the winter olympics in Sochi; confers with advisers about Crimea, deciding — unlike Khrushchev in 1954 — to arrange a plebiscite to let the people of Crimea, most of whom strongly opposed the coup regime, decide their own future.}

{How did what Putin called his close “working and personal relationship with President Obama” change into today’s deep distrust and saber-rattling? A short three years later after the close collaboration to resolve the Syrian problem peacefully, Putin spoke of the “feverish” state of international relations and lamented: “My personal agreements with the President of the United States have not produced results.” And things have gone downhill from there.}

What you're not getting.

The Many Reasons to Believe Vasily Prozorov’s Testimony About Ukraine’s Role in Downing MH-17
Former Ukrainian intelligence officer Vasily Prozorov’s testimony will likely be dismissed by Western governments that support Kiev, but there is plenty of evidence to back his claims.

[mintpressnews.com]

Where they want to take you is that Russia shot down that airliner by its Neo-Nazi ideology and symbolism implants.

Where they want to take you. {Prozorov then noted that, soon after the coup and before the civil war between Western and Eastern Ukraine had begun, the SBU — at Kiev’s behest — had begun to plan combat operations in the East and that the government had requested that plans be made that would result in mass civilian deaths among ethnic Russian populations, who were to be labeled as “accomplices to terrorists.”} To believe Russia invaded eastern Ukraine while all along the agenda was genocidal on their part towards Russia. SBU is the (Security Service of Ukraine) Essentially our mirror image of the CIA.

{In regard to Ukraine’s alleged role in the downing of MH-17, it is worth noting that past reports by late American investigative journalist Robert Parry described in detail how the “independent” MH-17 investigation was almost completely dependent on information from Ukraine’s SBU in piecing together the event. According to Parry:

[This control by the SBU, combined with its past obstruction of the UN torture probe],suggests that the SBU also would steer the JIT away from any evidence that might implicate a unit of the Ukrainian military in the shoot-down, a situation that would be regarded as a state secret which could severely undermine international support for the U.S.-backed regime in Kiev. Among the SBU’s official duties is the protection of Ukrainian government secrets.”}

The report from Robert Parry here>>[consortiumnews.com] along with more on Webb's other findings in her article. In which in Parry's article you'll find the photo the Ukraine government attempted to use as evidence against the Russians was actually a photo from an air show 2 years prior to the event.

Ray McGovern in the initial post states a fact I've repeated here often on Crimea. In which Russia didn't invade but accepted their vote to return to Russia. [en.wikipedia.org] Of course WIkipedia as they are, would, states it's controversial. But how controversial could a decision of 96.77% to return be!?! It's only controversial to those who wish to deny Russia this strategic position.

I underscore the term, strategic! Another word of conditioning repetitively used in the hearings used to promote fear of Russia and compliance to a false need to create global positioning. Which is really only a facade to benefit the ruling class while entire populations pay with lives.

I think that covers pretty much of the 4 blatant lies I've heard from the hearings to date. What's missing of course are the entire Obama's administrations actions that aren't in the related articles above. I actually heard on the Morning Show the other day, NPR, the host actually questioned in an interview on the Biden video. Comparing it to Trumps quid pro quo. Which by now everyone should know is extremely used, has been used, by governments for like, EVER! But only Trump has made it a sin.

Afraid I'm running out of space I'll continue below.