The Real Reasons Tulsi Gabbard Did Not Vote to Impeach Donald Trump

Gabbard’s decision had much more to do with a desire to censure Trump over his real crimes: carrying out wars without congressional approval, illegally “occupying and pillaging” Syria, “ and continuing to support Saudi Arabia’s “genocidal war” in Yemen.

[mintpressnews.com]

{She also introduced a resolution calling on the House to censure Trump on five issues she implied were far more substantial. Those include carrying out wars without congressional approval, illegally “occupying and pillaging” Syria, “recklessly enabling” Turkey to invade Northern Syria and ethnically cleanse Kurds (a U.S. ally), continuing to support Saudi Arabia’s “genocidal war” in Yemen and scrapping nuclear agreements with Iran and Russia, thereby strongly increasing the risk of nuclear proliferation.}

Well, my hats off to her on that! At least someone finally poked the pig with a stick made of substance.

{Jayapal claims that Trump’s approval ratings should not be considered static and that his support could quickly melt away if Republican senators “do the right thing” and back his removal.}

Can I get a, moronic? There's only 2 ways to take that. That is someone who doesn't have a dam clue what they're doing in DC, or simply someone who couldn't come up with a better line to mask their complicity to the facade.

{There also remains a serious question as to whether House Democrat Leader Nancy Pelosi will even send the articles to the Senate for a vote, leaving the process completely stalled.}

If she doesn't, 4 more years of Trump. Probably beyond that point now though. If she does, Biden will be thrown under the bus. And investigations into the Obama administration could follow. Schiff was a major player in the Ukraine quagmire also. Who lead this impeachment for the democrats. In which he dictated it from start to finish to benefit only them. And now Pelosi has the gall to want to dictate how the republican senate will run the judicial aspect.