And by saying that, J. krishnamurti is separating himself from the rest of us....is he violent then?

I wouldn't classify it as violence, but a disservice certainly. We're all humans and I don't see the point in separating into nationalities, ethnicities or theologies

Even if we are authentic in our agnostic/atheist views our cultural histories will always have some impact on our view if the world ,,,, lets not get too religious about our beliefs..

Only to an extent. It's nice to get a perspective that isn't affected by one's background or origin, but it does exist, & likely helped shape one, so you have to take it into consideration. & this term "violence" is about as bad as the extreme feminists viewing even consensual sex as "violence" or rape. Not a very good choice of a descriptor to my mind.

I don't see how this is a partical approach. I have a nationality, race, gender, etc. These properties of me are often useful indicators to others about what I likely know, and how I likely view the world.

Everyone does this. Indeed there is a strong current in society today requiring people to do this, lest they be judged culturally insensitive.

I think categorizing chosen differences as "violence" is rather much.
Violence is violence.
I get his point, and it is spurring discussion (which is always a good thing),
but I disagree with the length he goes to make it.